PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLAFX vs. FLCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLAFX vs. FLCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLAFX achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than FLCKX's 14.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TLAFX having a 14.48% annualized return and FLCKX not far ahead at 15.01%.


TLAFX

1D
0.65%
1M
0.97%
6M
9.34%
YTD
10.99%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
18.81%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
14.48%
ALL TIME*
13.70%

FLCKX

1D
1.98%
1M
-3.38%
6M
10.16%
YTD
14.16%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
15.01%
ALL TIME*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TLAFX vs. FLCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLAFX
Transamerica Large Core Fund
10.99%17.56%22.59%25.87%-16.76%29.74%15.30%26.68%-7.19%22.57%
FLCKX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K
14.16%20.45%27.06%26.21%-22.91%26.19%26.85%35.76%-16.34%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TLAFX and FLCKX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.91

The correlation between TLAFX and FLCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLAFX vs. FLCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLAFX
TLAFX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TLAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TLAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCKX
FLCKX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FLCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLAFX vs. FLCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLAFXFLCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.14

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.20

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

4.16

+5.76

TLAFX vs. FLCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the FLCKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLAFX and FLCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLAFX vs. FLCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum FLCKX drawdown of -69.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLAFX and FLCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLAFXFLCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-69.99%

+36.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-15.43%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.84%

-28.52%

+9.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.72%

-28.52%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.94%

-44.10%

+10.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-10.14%

+9.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-12.35%

+6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

4.43%

-2.39%

Volatility

TLAFX vs. FLCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) is 3.54%, while Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that TLAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLAFXFLCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

9.27%

-5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

20.66%

-10.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

24.66%

-12.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.60%

23.55%

-3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

23.62%

-4.19%

TLAFX vs. FLCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLAFX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCKX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLAFX vs. FLCKX - Dividend Comparison

TLAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.18%, more than FLCKX's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCKX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K
4.11%4.69%14.54%12.22%18.51%8.45%0.19%0.14%19.95%18.97%27.57%6.18%
TLAFX
Transamerica Large Core Fund
14.18%15.89%23.39%7.88%6.40%16.53%9.17%1.44%22.85%4.89%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLAFX and FLCKX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCKX has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to TLAFX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLAFX dropped -33.94% vs FLCKX's -69.99%.

TLAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLAFX and FLCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer