TLAFX vs. FGRTX
TLAFX (Transamerica Large Core Fund) and FGRTX (Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TLAFX returned 14.48%/yr vs 16.34%/yr for FGRTX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TLAFX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FGRTX.
Performance
TLAFX vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLAFX achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than FGRTX's 11.94% return. Over the past 10 years, TLAFX has underperformed FGRTX with an annualized return of 14.48%, while FGRTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.
TLAFX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 21.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.92%
- 10Y*
- 14.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.70%
FGRTX
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 24.88%
- 3Y*
- 23.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.67%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TLAFX vs. FGRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLAFX Transamerica Large Core Fund | 10.99% | 17.56% | 22.59% | 25.87% | -16.76% | 29.74% | 15.30% | 26.68% | -7.19% | 22.57% |
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund | 11.94% | 26.92% | 25.98% | 26.51% | -8.98% | 26.29% | 12.96% | 31.07% | -7.44% | 16.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLAFX and FGRTX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.93 |
The correlation between TLAFX and FGRTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLAFX vs. FGRTX — Risk / Return Rank
TLAFX
FGRTX
TLAFX vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLAFX | FGRTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.57 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 11.10 | -1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLAFX vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum FGRTX drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLAFX and FGRTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLAFX | FGRTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -56.17% | +22.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -8.99% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.84% | -18.51% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.72% | -23.35% | -7.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.94% | -35.18% | +1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.31% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -8.68% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.08% | -0.04% |
Volatility
TLAFX vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) is 3.54%, while Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that TLAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLAFX | FGRTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 3.78% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 10.02% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 12.90% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 16.72% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 18.08% | +1.35% |
TLAFX vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLAFX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FGRTX's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLAFX vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison
TLAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.18%, more than FGRTX's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund | 3.47% | 3.89% | 2.68% | 2.06% | 4.38% | 4.79% | 7.96% | 12.98% | 21.72% | 15.57% | 1.97% | 4.16% |
TLAFX Transamerica Large Core Fund | 14.18% | 15.89% | 23.39% | 7.88% | 6.40% | 16.53% | 9.17% | 1.44% | 22.85% | 4.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, TLAFX and FGRTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FGRTX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to TLAFX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLAFX dropped -33.94% vs FGRTX's -56.17%.
FGRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLAFX and FGRTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer