PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLA vs. ACYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLA vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TLA

1D
0.68%
1M
-7.40%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

ACYS

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.34%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.22M$7.08M$6.02M
$81.43K$70.64K$69.71K

TLA vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLA and ACYS is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLA vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLA vs. ACYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLA vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -11.80%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and ACYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLAACYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.80%

-0.78%

-11.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.79%

-0.15%

-8.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-0.17%

-1.61%

Volatility

TLA vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLAACYSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

3.76%

+12.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

3.76%

+12.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

3.76%

+12.87%

TLA vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLA vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.86%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TLA and ACYS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.

TLA has the higher dividend yield at 8.86%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 0.75% for ACYS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLA and ACYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer