PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TJUN vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TJUN vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUN achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -7.30% return.


TJUN

1D
-3.88%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.01%
1Y
13.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFTY

1D
-1.31%
1M
1.01%
YTD
-7.30%
6M
-7.62%
1Y
-6.58%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJUN vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TJUN and NFTY is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

0.50

The correlation between TJUN and NFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TJUN vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUN
TJUN Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUN vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TJUNNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.94

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

-0.41

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

-1.01

+14.11

TJUN vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUN and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TJUN vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUN drawdown since its inception was -4.47%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUN and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TJUNNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-47.67%

+43.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.47%

-16.14%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-15.26%

+11.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.58%

-9.60%

+9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

6.56%

-5.52%

Volatility

TJUN vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) is 4.01%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that TJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TJUNNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.23%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.42%

12.75%

-6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.33%

14.75%

-6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.33%

17.41%

-9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.33%

20.72%

-12.39%

TJUN vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TJUN vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.91%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%
TJUN
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TJUN and NFTY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFTY has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to TJUN (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUN dropped -4.47% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 1-year performance, TJUN leads with 13.53% vs -6.58% for NFTY. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, TJUN has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TJUN has performed better with a 13.53% return vs -6.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

TJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TJUN and 0.80% for NFTY.

TJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TJUN and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer