TJUL vs. PBAP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TJUL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025) and PBAP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TJUL returned 5.97% vs 13.50% for PBAP. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBAP.

Performance

TJUL vs. PBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUL achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than PBAP's 6.92% return.

TJUL

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 2.20%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 5.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBAP

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 6.92%
• 6M: 7.66%
• 1Y: 13.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJUL vs. PBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025	2.20%	6.55%	5.71%
PBAP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April	6.92%	6.34%	8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between TJUL and PBAP is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.71

The correlation between TJUL and PBAP shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TJUL vs. PBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUL

TJUL Risk / Return Rank: 68
TJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
TJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
TJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PBAP

PBAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
PBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUL vs. PBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TJUL	PBAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	4.35	-2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	7.45	-4.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	2.17	-0.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	11.57	-8.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.37	83.47	-70.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TJUL vs. PBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is lower than the PBAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUL and PBAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TJUL	PBAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	4.35	-2.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.64	1.46	+0.18

Drawdowns

TJUL vs. PBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUL drawdown since its inception was -4.61%, smaller than the maximum PBAP drawdown of -9.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUL and PBAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TJUL	PBAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-9.70%	+5.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.08%	-1.17%	-0.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-0.79%	+0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	0.16%	+0.29%

Volatility

TJUL vs. PBAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) is 0.51%, while PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP) has a volatility of 0.59%. This indicates that TJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TJUL	PBAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.51%	0.59%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.15%	2.01%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77%	3.12%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.26%	7.09%	-2.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.26%	7.09%	-2.83%

TJUL vs. PBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TJUL vs. PBAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither TJUL nor PBAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TJUL and PBAP in my portfolio?

TJUL and PBAP have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TJUL or PBAP?

PBAP has higher volatility (0.59%) compared to TJUL (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUL dropped -4.61% vs PBAP's -9.70%.

Which ETF is better, TJUL or PBAP?

On 1-year performance, PBAP leads with 13.50% vs 5.97% for TJUL. On fees, PBAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TJUL or PBAP?

Over the 1-year period, PBAP has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TJUL or PBAP?

PBAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TJUL or PBAP?

TJUL and PBAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TJUL and PBAP?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJUL and 0.50% for PBAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.