PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TJUL vs. IWMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TJUL vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUL achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 16.07% return.


TJUL

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
1.93%
6M
1.76%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWMY

1D
0.83%
1M
2.53%
YTD
16.07%
6M
13.47%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJUL vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TJUL and IWMY is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023

0.60

The correlation between TJUL and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TJUL vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUL
TJUL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUL vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TJULIWMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.06

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.79

6.73

+5.06

TJUL vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUL and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TJUL vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUL drawdown since its inception was -4.61%, smaller than the maximum IWMY drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUL and IWMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TJULIWMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-18.72%

+14.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.08%

-11.57%

+9.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-2.93%

+2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

3.54%

-3.09%

Volatility

TJUL vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) is 0.81%, while Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that TJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TJULIWMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

5.96%

-5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

13.54%

-11.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85%

16.37%

-13.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.24%

15.93%

-11.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.24%

15.93%

-11.69%

TJUL vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TJUL vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

TJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.15%.


PositionTTM202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
44.15%63.33%107.92%11.34%
TJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TJUL and IWMY have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWMY has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to TJUL (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUL dropped -4.61% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 23.73% vs 5.33% for TJUL. On fees, TJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, TJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 23.73% return vs 5.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 44.15%, compared with 0.00% for TJUL.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJUL and 0.99% for IWMY.

TJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TJUL and IWMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer