PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TJUL vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TJUL vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUL achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.


TJUL

1D
0.12%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.51%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBO

1D
-2.66%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
79.84%
6M
74.51%
1Y
77.38%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJUL vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025
2.20%6.55%8.18%3.05%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
79.84%-11.71%7.85%-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TJUL and DBO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2023

-0.01

The correlation between TJUL and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TJUL vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TJUL
DBO

Technology

33.6%

-

Financial Services

12.4%
116.0%

Communication Services

10.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Healthcare

9.5%

-

Industrials

8.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.3%

-

Energy

4.0%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Technology

TJUL
33.6%
DBO

-

Financial Services

TJUL
12.4%
DBO
116.0%

Communication Services

TJUL
10.5%
DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

TJUL
10.0%
DBO

-

Healthcare

TJUL
9.5%
DBO

-

Industrials

TJUL
8.5%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

TJUL
5.3%
DBO

-

Energy

TJUL
4.0%
DBO

-

Utilities

TJUL
2.5%
DBO

-

Real Estate

TJUL
2.0%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

TJUL
1.9%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TJUL vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUL
TJUL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUL vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TJULDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

4.28

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.37

8.69

+4.68

TJUL vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUL and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TJULDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.25

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.64

0.02

+1.63

Drawdowns

TJUL vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUL drawdown since its inception was -4.61%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUL and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TJULDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-90.18%

+85.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.08%

-18.19%

+16.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-52.68%

+52.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-62.25%

+61.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

8.94%

-8.49%

Volatility

TJUL vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) is 0.51%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that TJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TJULDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

12.79%

-12.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.15%

28.32%

-26.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77%

34.58%

-31.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.26%

32.31%

-28.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.26%

31.79%

-27.53%

TJUL vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

TJUL vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

TJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.95%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
TJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TJUL and DBO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to TJUL (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUL dropped -4.61% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 77.38% vs 5.97% for TJUL. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, TJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 77.38% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TJUL.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.00% for TJUL.

TJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJUL and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TJUL and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer