TJUL vs. DBO
TJUL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TJUL is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. TJUL is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, TJUL returned 5.97% vs 77.38% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. TJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
TJUL vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TJUL achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.
TJUL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 5.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 79.84%
- 6M
- 74.51%
- 1Y
- 77.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
TJUL vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 | 2.20% | 6.55% | 8.18% | 3.05% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.84% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TJUL and DBO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2023 | -0.01 |
The correlation between TJUL and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TJUL vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TJUL
DBO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
TJUL
DBO
-
Financial Services
TJUL
DBO
Communication Services
TJUL
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
TJUL
DBO
-
Healthcare
TJUL
DBO
-
Industrials
TJUL
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
TJUL
DBO
-
Energy
TJUL
DBO
-
Utilities
TJUL
DBO
-
Real Estate
TJUL
DBO
-
Basic Materials
TJUL
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TJUL vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
TJUL
DBO
TJUL vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TJUL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.36 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 4.28 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.37 | 8.69 | +4.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TJUL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.25 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 0.02 | +1.63 |
Drawdowns
TJUL vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TJUL drawdown since its inception was -4.61%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUL and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TJUL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.61% | -90.18% | +85.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.08% | -18.19% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -52.68% | +52.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -62.25% | +61.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | 8.94% | -8.49% |
Volatility
TJUL vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) is 0.51%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that TJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TJUL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 12.79% | -12.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.15% | 28.32% | -26.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77% | 34.58% | -31.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 32.31% | -28.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 31.79% | -27.53% |
TJUL vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
TJUL vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
TJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TJUL and DBO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to TJUL (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUL dropped -4.61% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 77.38% vs 5.97% for TJUL. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, TJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 77.38% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TJUL.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.00% for TJUL.
TJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJUL and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TJUL and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer