TJUL vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TJUL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TJUL is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TJUL returned 5.85% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

TJUL vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUL achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.63% return.

TJUL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 2.08%
• 6M: 2.41%
• 1Y: 5.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJUL vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025	2.08%	6.55%	3.11%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TJUL and CSHP is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	0.04

The correlation between TJUL and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TJUL vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TJUL	CSHP
Technology	33.6%	-
Financial Services	12.4%	0.1%
Communication Services	10.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	-
Healthcare	9.5%	-
Industrials	8.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	-
Energy	4.0%	-
Utilities	2.5%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

TJUL vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUL

TJUL Risk / Return Rank: 65
TJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
TJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
TJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 67
TJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUL vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TJUL	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	11.91	-9.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	31.26	-28.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	7.44	-6.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	65.71	-62.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.10	432.16	-419.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TJUL vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUL and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TJUL	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	11.91	-9.79
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.64	10.75	-9.12

Drawdowns

TJUL vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUL drawdown since its inception was -4.61%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUL and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TJUL	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-0.08%	-4.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.08%	-0.06%	-2.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	0.00%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-0.00%	-0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	0.01%	+0.44%

Volatility

TJUL vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) has a higher volatility of 0.51% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that TJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TJUL	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.51%	0.07%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.14%	0.24%	+1.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77%	0.33%	+2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.26%	0.40%	+3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.26%	0.40%	+3.86%

TJUL vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

TJUL vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

TJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TJUL and CSHP in my portfolio?

TJUL and CSHP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TJUL or CSHP?

TJUL has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUL dropped -4.61% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, TJUL or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, TJUL leads with 5.85% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TJUL or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, TJUL has performed better with a 5.85% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TJUL or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TJUL or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.00% for TJUL.

What is the main difference between TJUL and CSHP?

TJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJUL and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.