TJAN vs. MRCP

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027) and MRCP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TJAN returned 7.84% vs 17.45% for MRCP. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MRCP.

Performance

TJAN vs. MRCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJAN achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than MRCP's 6.38% return.

TJAN

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 7.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MRCP

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 7.14%
• 1Y: 17.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJAN vs. MRCP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027	2.43%	7.40%
MRCP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March	6.38%	14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TJAN and MRCP is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.86

The correlation between TJAN and MRCP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TJAN vs. MRCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJAN

TJAN Risk / Return Rank: 89
TJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
TJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
TJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

MRCP

MRCP Risk / Return Rank: 88
MRCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MRCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MRCP Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MRCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
MRCP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJAN vs. MRCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TJAN	MRCP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	2.78	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	4.05	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.58	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	3.64	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.86	20.82	-0.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TJAN vs. MRCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the MRCP Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJAN and MRCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TJAN	MRCP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	2.78	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	1.55	+0.04

Drawdowns

TJAN vs. MRCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum MRCP drawdown of -10.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJAN and MRCP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TJAN	MRCP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-10.73%	+5.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.10%	-4.81%	+2.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-1.04%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-0.77%	+0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.40%	0.84%	-0.44%

Volatility

TJAN vs. MRCP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) is 0.47%, while PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) has a volatility of 1.62%. This indicates that TJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TJAN	MRCP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.47%	1.62%	-1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.16%	5.07%	-2.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79%	6.32%	-3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.41%	9.28%	-4.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.41%	9.28%	-4.87%

TJAN vs. MRCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MRCP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TJAN vs. MRCP - Dividend Comparison

Neither TJAN nor MRCP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TJAN and MRCP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, TJAN and MRCP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TJAN or MRCP?

MRCP has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to TJAN (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJAN dropped -4.83% vs MRCP's -10.73%.

Which ETF is better, TJAN or MRCP?

On 1-year performance, MRCP leads with 17.45% vs 7.84% for TJAN. On fees, MRCP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TJAN or MRCP?

Over the 1-year period, MRCP has performed better with a 17.45% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TJAN or MRCP?

MRCP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TJAN or MRCP?

TJAN and MRCP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TJAN and MRCP?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJAN and 0.50% for MRCP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.