TISBX vs. LADYX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX).
TISBX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. LADYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Dec 30, 1997.
Performance
TISBX vs. LADYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TISBX vs. LADYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | 0.89% | 12.72% | 11.60% | 17.07% | -20.31% | 14.85% | 20.14% | 25.61% | -10.99% | 13.14% |
LADYX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I | -0.44% | 14.64% | 22.21% | 8.74% | -35.92% | -2.50% | 72.82% | 31.89% | 4.89% | 30.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TISBX achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly higher than LADYX's -0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, TISBX has underperformed LADYX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while LADYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.28% annualized return.
TISBX
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 25.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
LADYX
- 1D
- 6.26%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 38.65%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TISBX vs. LADYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TISBX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than LADYX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TISBX vs. LADYX — Risk / Return Rank
TISBX
LADYX
TISBX vs. LADYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TISBX | LADYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.36 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.91 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.53 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.05 | 9.13 | -3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TISBX | LADYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.36 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | -0.07 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.46 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.35 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between TISBX and LADYX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TISBX vs. LADYX - Dividend Comparison
TISBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while LADYX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | 4.09% | 4.12% | 6.82% | 3.09% | 1.97% | 8.96% | 2.65% | 5.16% | 9.29% | 4.49% | 4.03% | 4.77% |
LADYX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.60% | 7.58% | 18.36% | 28.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.82% |
Drawdowns
TISBX vs. LADYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TISBX drawdown since its inception was -56.50%, smaller than the maximum LADYX drawdown of -60.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TISBX and LADYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TISBX | LADYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.50% | -60.18% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -14.67% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.89% | -50.98% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.69% | -54.05% | +12.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.88% | -20.61% | +12.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -20.22% | +10.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 4.07% | -0.37% |
Volatility
TISBX vs. LADYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) is 7.49%, while Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) has a volatility of 12.64%. This indicates that TISBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LADYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TISBX | LADYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 12.64% | -5.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.50% | 20.98% | -6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.37% | 28.61% | -5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 27.53% | -4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 27.00% | -3.61% |