TISBX vs. DFISX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TISBX (TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund) and DFISX (DFA International Small Company Portfolio) are both mutual funds - TISBX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by TIAA, while DFISX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Over the past 10 years, TISBX returned 10.72%/yr vs 8.30%/yr for DFISX. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TISBX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DFISX.

Performance

TISBX vs. DFISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TISBX achieves a 18.89% return, which is significantly higher than DFISX's 8.74% return. Over the past 10 years, TISBX has outperformed DFISX with an annualized return of 10.72%, while DFISX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.30% annualized return.

TISBX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -2.10%
• 6M: 11.75%
• YTD: 18.89%
• 1Y: 36.94%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 7.18%
• 10Y*: 10.72%
• ALL TIME*: 9.38%

DFISX

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 2.95%
• YTD: 8.74%
• 1Y: 21.14%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: 7.18%
• 10Y*: 8.30%
• ALL TIME*: 7.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TISBX vs. DFISX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund	18.89%	12.72%	11.60%	17.07%	-20.31%	14.85%	20.14%	25.61%	-10.99%	13.14%
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio	8.74%	36.35%	3.76%	14.46%	-17.13%	10.71%	9.27%	24.18%	-19.42%	24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between TISBX and DFISX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2002	0.65

The correlation between TISBX and DFISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TISBX vs. DFISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TISBX

TISBX Risk / Return Rank: 76
TISBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
TISBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
TISBX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
TISBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
TISBX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

DFISX

DFISX Risk / Return Rank: 49
DFISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
DFISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
DFISX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DFISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
DFISX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TISBX vs. DFISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TISBX	DFISX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.52	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.19	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.27	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	1.83	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.13	6.24	+4.89

TISBX vs. DFISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TISBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the DFISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TISBX and DFISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TISBX vs. DFISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TISBX drawdown since its inception was -56.50%, smaller than the maximum DFISX drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TISBX and DFISX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TISBX	DFISX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.50%	-60.66%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.95%	-11.96%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.44%	-13.68%	-13.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.89%	-35.06%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.69%	-43.00%	+1.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.00%	-2.12%	-0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.63%	-11.60%	+1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	3.49%	-0.40%

Volatility

TISBX vs. DFISX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) is 3.82%, while DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that TISBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TISBX	DFISX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	4.38%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.09%	12.10%	+1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.42%	14.43%	+4.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.51%	15.96%	+6.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.41%	15.95%	+7.46%

TISBX vs. DFISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TISBX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DFISX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

TISBX vs. DFISX - Dividend Comparison

TISBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than DFISX's 2.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio	2.92%	3.19%	3.39%	3.01%	3.51%	3.06%	1.71%	4.54%	7.74%	1.27%	4.44%	4.47%
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund	3.47%	4.12%	6.82%	3.09%	1.97%	8.96%	2.65%	5.16%	9.29%	4.49%	4.03%	4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TISBX and DFISX in my portfolio?

TISBX and DFISX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TISBX or DFISX?

DFISX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to TISBX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TISBX dropped -56.50% vs DFISX's -60.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TISBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.