TIPD vs. QLC
TIPD (Northern Trust 2055 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TIPD is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. TIPD is actively managed, while QLC is passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TIPD charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QLC.
Performance
TIPD vs. QLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPD achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than QLC's 11.27% return.
TIPD
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLC
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 26.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
TIPD vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIPD Northern Trust 2055 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 0.74% | 1.97% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 11.27% | 9.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPD and QLC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPD vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank
TIPD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QLC
TIPD vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2055 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPD) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIPD | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIPD vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPD drawdown since its inception was -4.01%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPD and QLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPD | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -35.86% | +31.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -0.85% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -4.52% | +2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.96% | — |
Volatility
TIPD vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPD | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.17% | 12.95% | -6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.17% | 16.92% | -10.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.17% | 18.38% | -12.21% |
TIPD vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIPD has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TIPD vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison
TIPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than QLC's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 0.94% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.46% | 0.96% | 1.40% | 1.91% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.80% | 0.64% |
TIPD Northern Trust 2055 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 6.83% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPD and QLC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIPD is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPD is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.
TIPD has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 0.94% for QLC.
TIPD is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPD and 0.25% for QLC.
Find the right allocation for TIPD and QLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer