PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIP5.L vs. IBCI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIP5.L vs. IBCI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) and iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TIP5.L is traded in USD, while IBCI.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBCI.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIP5.L achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than IBCI.L's -0.06% return.


TIP5.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.20%
6M
1.42%
YTD
1.21%
1Y
2.91%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*

IBCI.L

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.04%
6M
0.40%
YTD
-0.06%
1Y
1.49%
3Y*
2.57%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
1.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIP5.L vs. IBCI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIP5.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.21%6.33%3.94%4.20%-2.77%5.40%4.98%4.81%0.71%0.01%
IBCI.L
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-0.06%14.03%-6.15%8.94%-14.56%-1.69%11.77%5.24%-6.65%16.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TIP5.L and IBCI.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2017

0.29

The correlation between TIP5.L and IBCI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIP5.L vs. IBCI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIP5.L
TIP5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TIP5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCI.L
IBCI.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
IBCI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIP5.L vs. IBCI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) and iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIP5.LIBCI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.04

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

0.28

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.74

0.70

+5.04

TIP5.L vs. IBCI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIP5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the IBCI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIP5.L and IBCI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIP5.L vs. IBCI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIP5.L drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum IBCI.L drawdown of -39.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP5.L and IBCI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIP5.LIBCI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-39.46%

+34.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-5.20%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.88%

-15.03%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.22%

-27.24%

+22.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-19.70%

+18.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-25.91%

+25.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

2.11%

-1.60%

Volatility

TIP5.L vs. IBCI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) is 0.54%, while iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L) has a volatility of 1.56%. This indicates that TIP5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIP5.LIBCI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

1.56%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.68%

6.19%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

7.96%

-3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.98%

13.69%

-9.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.79%

12.96%

-9.17%

TIP5.L vs. IBCI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIP5.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IBCI.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIP5.L vs. IBCI.L - Dividend Comparison

TIP5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, while IBCI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBCI.L
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIP5.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.13%5.94%6.18%5.15%0.29%0.37%3.00%3.27%2.99%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIP5.L and IBCI.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCI.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCI.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TIP5.L.

TIP5.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while IBCI.L tracks BBG Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (EUR). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIP5.L and 0.09% for IBCI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIP5.L and IBCI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer