TIP vs. SPLV
TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) and SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index, while SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TIP returned 2.53%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for SPLV. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TIP charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLV.
Performance
TIP vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIP achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than SPLV's 5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, TIP has underperformed SPLV with an annualized return of 2.53%, while SPLV has yielded a comparatively higher 8.36% annualized return.
TIP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.91%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
SPLV
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
TIP vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 1.40% | 6.77% | 1.65% | 3.80% | -12.26% | 5.68% | 10.84% | 8.35% | -1.42% | 2.92% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 5.23% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | -4.88% | 24.13% | -1.39% | 27.87% | -0.19% | 17.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIP and SPLV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, TIP and SPLV have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIP vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank
TIP
SPLV
TIP vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIP | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.07 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 0.56 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 1.31 | +5.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIP vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP and SPLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIP | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.57% | -36.26% | +21.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.98% | -7.41% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.54% | -9.64% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.51% | -17.26% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.51% | -36.26% | +21.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -3.31% | +2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.43% | -3.55% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 3.15% | -2.49% |
Volatility
TIP vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) is 1.03%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that TIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIP | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 4.01% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 7.23% | -4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 10.14% | -6.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 12.50% | -6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 15.38% | -9.64% |
TIP vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TIP vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison
TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than SPLV's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.14% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 3.76% | 3.46% | 2.52% | 2.73% | 6.96% | 4.28% | 1.17% | 1.75% | 2.71% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIP and SPLV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLV has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to TIP (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIP dropped -14.57% vs SPLV's -36.26%.
On 10-year performance, SPLV leads with 8.36% vs 2.53% for TIP. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPLV has performed better with a 8.36% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TIP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.
TIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 2.14% for SPLV.
TIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SPLV is S&P 500. TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index, while SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TIP and 0.25% for SPLV.
TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIP and SPLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer