TIP vs. EDEN
TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) and EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index, while EDEN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TIP returned 2.53%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for EDEN. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TIP charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for EDEN.
Performance
TIP vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIP achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's -3.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TIP has underperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 2.53%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively higher 9.22% annualized return.
TIP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.91%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
EDEN
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -3.05%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- -5.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
TIP vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 1.40% | 6.77% | 1.65% | 3.80% | -12.26% | 5.68% | 10.84% | 8.35% | -1.42% | 2.92% |
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | -3.05% | 10.58% | -3.94% | 17.99% | -11.47% | 14.81% | 42.56% | 24.37% | -14.43% | 35.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIP and EDEN is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2012 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, TIP and EDEN have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIP vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank
TIP
EDEN
TIP vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIP | EDEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.96 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | -0.33 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | -0.72 | +7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIP vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum EDEN drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP and EDEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIP | EDEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.57% | -36.61% | +22.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.98% | -21.17% | +19.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.54% | -29.31% | +24.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.51% | -36.61% | +22.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.51% | -36.61% | +22.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -13.55% | +13.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.43% | -7.37% | +3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 10.27% | -9.61% |
Volatility
TIP vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) is 1.03%, while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that TIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIP | EDEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 4.93% | -3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 15.72% | -13.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 20.90% | -17.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 20.25% | -14.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 19.41% | -13.67% |
TIP vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EDEN's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIP vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison
TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than EDEN's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 2.87% | 2.79% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 3.76% | 3.46% | 2.52% | 2.73% | 6.96% | 4.28% | 1.17% | 1.75% | 2.71% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIP and EDEN have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDEN has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to TIP (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIP dropped -14.57% vs EDEN's -36.61%.
On 10-year performance, EDEN leads with 9.22% vs 2.53% for TIP. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EDEN has performed better with a 9.22% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TIP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDEN.
TIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 2.87% for EDEN.
TIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while EDEN is Europe Equities. TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index, while EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TIP and 0.53% for EDEN.
TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIP and EDEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer