PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINRX vs. VITPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINRX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TINRX having a 11.58% return and VITPX slightly higher at 11.99%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TINRX having a 14.63% annualized return and VITPX not far ahead at 15.19%.


TINRX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.66%
YTD
11.58%
6M
11.45%
1Y
28.24%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
14.63%

VITPX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.89%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINRX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TINRX
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A
11.58%16.71%23.38%25.60%-19.38%25.30%20.46%30.56%-5.55%19.06%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.99%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-5.59%20.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TINRX and VITPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2006

1.00

The correlation between TINRX and VITPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINRX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINRX
TINRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TINRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TINRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINRX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TINRXVITPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.38

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.14

15.60

-0.45

TINRX vs. VITPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the VITPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINRX and VITPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TINRXVITPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.47

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.78

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.83

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.51

+0.02

Drawdowns

TINRX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINRX drawdown since its inception was -55.63%, roughly equal to the maximum VITPX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINRX and VITPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINRXVITPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.63%

-55.28%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-8.92%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-19.35%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

-25.31%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.92%

-34.99%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-8.02%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.93%

0.00%

Volatility

TINRX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) have volatilities of 2.94% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINRXVITPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.94%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

9.19%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

12.19%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

17.35%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

18.41%

-0.02%

TINRX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINRX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINRX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison

TINRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than VITPX's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TINRX
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A
1.86%2.08%1.34%1.20%1.54%1.79%1.17%1.70%2.08%0.51%2.13%1.24%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.24%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TINRX and VITPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VITPX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to TINRX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINRX dropped -55.63% vs VITPX's -55.28%.

VITPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINRX and VITPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer