PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINRX vs. FULVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINRX vs. FULVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund (FULVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINRX achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than FULVX's -0.01% return.


TINRX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.66%
YTD
11.58%
6M
11.45%
1Y
28.24%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
14.63%

FULVX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
-0.55%
1Y
0.65%
3Y*
9.47%
5Y*
5.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINRX vs. FULVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TINRX
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A
11.58%16.71%23.38%25.60%-19.38%25.30%20.46%5.34%
FULVX
Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund
-0.01%5.23%17.76%6.38%-10.43%17.79%3.83%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TINRX and FULVX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2019

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between TINRX and FULVX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINRX vs. FULVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINRX
TINRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TINRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TINRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FULVX
FULVX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FULVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FULVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FULVX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FULVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FULVX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINRX vs. FULVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund (FULVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TINRXFULVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.01

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

0.00

+3.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.14

0.00

+15.14

TINRX vs. FULVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the FULVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINRX and FULVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TINRXFULVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

0.00

+2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.43

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.40

+0.13

Drawdowns

TINRX vs. FULVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINRX drawdown since its inception was -55.63%, which is greater than FULVX's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINRX and FULVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINRXFULVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.63%

-33.24%

-22.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-6.33%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-10.31%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

-18.64%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.95%

+3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-5.09%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.16%

-0.23%

Volatility

TINRX vs. FULVX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund (FULVX) at 1.84%. This indicates that TINRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FULVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINRXFULVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

1.84%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

5.81%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

8.38%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

12.19%

+5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

16.22%

+2.17%

TINRX vs. FULVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINRX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FULVX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINRX vs. FULVX - Dividend Comparison

TINRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than FULVX's 13.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FULVX
Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund
13.25%6.82%5.76%1.65%4.98%5.35%0.62%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TINRX
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A
1.86%2.08%1.34%1.20%1.54%1.79%1.17%1.70%2.08%0.51%2.13%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINRX and FULVX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TINRX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to FULVX (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINRX dropped -55.63% vs FULVX's -33.24%.

TINRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINRX and FULVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer