PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINGX vs. LTUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINGX vs. LTUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) and Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINGX achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly higher than LTUSX's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TINGX has outperformed LTUSX with an annualized return of 7.03%, while LTUSX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.02% annualized return.


TINGX

1D
0.67%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.68%
6M
11.54%
1Y
14.07%
3Y*
9.51%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*
7.03%

LTUSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.45%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
1.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINGX vs. LTUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TINGX
Thornburg International Growth Fund
10.68%10.63%2.46%18.41%-26.05%-4.22%34.34%26.27%-16.75%34.94%
LTUSX
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
0.47%6.40%2.40%3.40%-8.06%-1.82%3.77%3.61%0.98%0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TINGX and LTUSX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

-0.05

The correlation between TINGX and LTUSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINGX vs. LTUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINGX
TINGX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TINGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TINGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

LTUSX
LTUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LTUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LTUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINGX vs. LTUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) and Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TINGXLTUSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.94

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

5.84

-2.23

TINGX vs. LTUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the LTUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINGX and LTUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TINGXLTUSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.53

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.17

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.33

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.15

-0.77

Drawdowns

TINGX vs. LTUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINGX drawdown since its inception was -62.73%, which is greater than LTUSX's maximum drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINGX and LTUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINGXLTUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.73%

-12.34%

-50.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-2.31%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.94%

-3.69%

-16.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.27%

-11.69%

-31.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.27%

-12.34%

-30.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-1.50%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.58%

-1.40%

-12.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

0.76%

+3.06%

Volatility

TINGX vs. LTUSX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) at 0.95%. This indicates that TINGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINGXLTUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

0.95%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

2.04%

+9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

2.93%

+11.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

4.02%

+13.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

3.08%

+14.01%

TINGX vs. LTUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LTUSX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINGX vs. LTUSX - Dividend Comparison

TINGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than LTUSX's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTUSX
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
2.63%2.69%2.62%1.89%1.63%1.21%1.35%1.77%1.90%1.45%2.52%1.50%
TINGX
Thornburg International Growth Fund
0.97%1.08%8.40%0.58%0.72%6.86%1.17%0.72%4.39%3.60%0.36%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINGX and LTUSX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TINGX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to LTUSX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINGX dropped -62.73% vs LTUSX's -12.34%.

LTUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINGX and LTUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer