PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTMFX vs. MWTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTMFX vs. MWTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) and Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTMFX achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than MWTIX's -0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LTMFX has underperformed MWTIX with an annualized return of 1.29%, while MWTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.37% annualized return.


LTMFX

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.11%
6M
-0.80%
YTD
0.04%
1Y
2.07%
3Y*
3.29%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
1.29%
ALL TIME*
1.55%

MWTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.10%
6M
-0.98%
YTD
-0.71%
1Y
1.92%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
-0.94%
10Y*
1.37%
ALL TIME*
4.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LTMFX vs. MWTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTMFX
Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund
0.04%5.74%1.84%3.83%-5.27%-0.18%2.97%3.81%1.00%2.29%
MWTIX
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I
-0.71%7.51%0.77%6.02%-15.49%-1.32%9.00%9.10%0.36%3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between LTMFX and MWTIX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2000

0.49

The correlation between LTMFX and MWTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTMFX vs. MWTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LTMFX
LTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MWTIX
MWTIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MWTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MWTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LTMFX vs. MWTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) and Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTMFXMWTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.13

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.94

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

2.30

+1.39

LTMFX vs. MWTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTMFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the MWTIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTMFX and MWTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTMFX vs. MWTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTMFX drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum MWTIX drawdown of -20.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTMFX and MWTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTMFXMWTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-20.58%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.96%

-3.34%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.95%

-6.09%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.40%

-20.51%

+12.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.40%

-20.58%

+12.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-4.89%

+3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-2.78%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

1.36%

-0.64%

Volatility

LTMFX vs. MWTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) is 0.54%, while Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that LTMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MWTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTMFXMWTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

1.04%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.38%

3.29%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68%

4.18%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.37%

6.66%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.27%

5.34%

-3.07%

LTMFX vs. MWTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTMFX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MWTIX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTMFX vs. MWTIX - Dividend Comparison

LTMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than MWTIX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTMFX
Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund
2.98%4.28%3.60%2.11%1.62%1.27%1.54%1.78%1.83%1.64%1.57%1.56%
MWTIX
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I
3.75%3.89%4.38%4.11%2.08%1.12%6.48%3.61%2.91%2.14%3.35%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTMFX and MWTIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MWTIX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to LTMFX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTMFX dropped -8.40% vs MWTIX's -20.58%.

LTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTMFX and MWTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer