TINGX vs. GSINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX).
TINGX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Jan 31, 2007. GSINX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 14, 2016.
Performance
TINGX vs. GSINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TINGX vs. GSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINGX Thornburg International Growth Fund | -6.59% | 10.63% | 2.46% | 18.41% | -26.05% | -4.22% | 34.34% | 26.27% | -16.75% | 34.36% |
GSINX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 3.75% | 20.76% | 9.53% | 21.93% | -11.14% | 12.35% | 15.64% | 27.41% | -6.14% | 29.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINGX achieves a -6.59% return, which is significantly lower than GSINX's 3.75% return.
TINGX
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -10.23%
- YTD
- -6.59%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- -1.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.28%
GSINX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TINGX vs. GSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GSINX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TINGX vs. GSINX — Risk / Return Rank
TINGX
GSINX
TINGX vs. GSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINGX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.20 | 1.27 | -1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.39 | 1.68 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.27 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 1.80 | -1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 7.33 | -6.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINGX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 1.27 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.72 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.80 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between TINGX and GSINX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TINGX vs. GSINX - Dividend Comparison
TINGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than GSINX's 4.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINGX Thornburg International Growth Fund | 1.15% | 1.08% | 8.40% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 6.86% | 1.17% | 0.72% | 4.39% | 3.60% | 0.36% | 0.29% |
GSINX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 4.85% | 5.03% | 11.11% | 2.27% | 4.79% | 2.13% | 0.08% | 0.57% | 0.43% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TINGX vs. GSINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINGX drawdown since its inception was -62.73%, which is greater than GSINX's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINGX and GSINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINGX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.73% | -28.80% | -33.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -8.74% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.27% | -25.46% | -17.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.41% | -6.11% | -11.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.64% | -4.88% | -8.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 2.15% | +1.63% |
Volatility
TINGX vs. GSINX - Volatility Comparison
Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) at 4.84%. This indicates that TINGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TINGX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 4.84% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.63% | 7.38% | +3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.47% | 12.48% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 14.44% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 15.78% | +1.18% |