PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TINF.TO (TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF) and XDGH.TO (iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Global Equities funds. TINF.TO is actively managed, while XDGH.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TINF.TO returned 12.77%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for XDGH.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINF.TO charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for XDGH.TO.

Performance

TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINF.TO achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly higher than XDGH.TO's 7.16% return.

TINF.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
9.87%
6M
8.63%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
—

XDGH.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
2.01%
YTD
7.16%
6M
8.39%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
12.90%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TINF.TO
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF		9.87%14.91%22.73%4.63%3.82%9.89%5.19%
XDGH.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		7.16%14.60%10.46%8.74%-1.32%15.60%10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between TINF.TO and XDGH.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020

0.45

TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TINF.TO
XDGH.TO

Utilities

44.0%
5.6%

Industrials

33.4%
12.6%

Energy

22.6%
10.3%

Financial Services

1.8%
13.2%

Basic Materials

-

2.4%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.8%

Healthcare

-

16.9%

Real Estate

-

0.2%

Technology

-

9.6%

Utilities

TINF.TO
44.0%
XDGH.TO
5.6%

Industrials

TINF.TO
33.4%
XDGH.TO
12.6%

Energy

TINF.TO
22.6%
XDGH.TO
10.3%

Financial Services

TINF.TO
1.8%
XDGH.TO
13.2%

Basic Materials

TINF.TO

-

XDGH.TO
2.4%

Communication Services

TINF.TO

-

XDGH.TO
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TINF.TO

-

XDGH.TO
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

TINF.TO

-

XDGH.TO
14.8%

Healthcare

TINF.TO

-

XDGH.TO
16.9%

Real Estate

TINF.TO

-

XDGH.TO
0.2%

Technology

TINF.TO

-

XDGH.TO
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with TINF.TO:
TINF.TO vs. ZGI.TOTINF.TO vs. XETM.TOTINF.TO vs. HPR.TOTINF.TO vs. VEQT.TOTINF.TO vs. TGRO.TOTINF.TO vs. MEQT.TOTINF.TO vs. TILV.TO
Often compared with XDGH.TO:
XDGH.TO vs. XDG.TOXDGH.TO vs. XHD.TOXDGH.TO vs. XEQT.TOXDGH.TO vs. XDUH.TOXDGH.TO vs. VFV.TOXDGH.TO vs. VIDY.TOXDGH.TO vs. ACWV

Return for Risk

TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TINF.TO
TINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO
XDGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TINF.TOXDGH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
1.78

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.97
2.69

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

2.69

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

8.01

-0.41

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINF.TO and XDGH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TINF.TOXDGH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.78

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

0.67

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.54

+0.44

Drawdowns

TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.48%, smaller than the maximum XDGH.TO drawdown of -32.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINF.TO and XDGH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TINF.TOXDGH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.48%

-32.99%

+19.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-6.38%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.23%

-11.96%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.48%

-14.56%

+1.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-2.25%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-3.63%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.14%

-0.18%

Volatility

TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO) at 2.55%. This indicates that TINF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDGH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TINF.TOXDGH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

2.55%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

6.84%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.39%

9.67%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.83%

12.14%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.02%

14.60%

-2.58%

TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINF.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than XDGH.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINF.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Dividend Comparison

TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than XDGH.TO's 2.81% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TINF.TO
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF		2.65%2.89%2.85%3.39%2.97%2.28%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDGH.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.81%2.81%3.04%3.41%3.18%3.05%3.24%2.82%3.29%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

TINF.TO and XDGH.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDGH.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDGH.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for TINF.TO.

They also come from different issuers: TD and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for TINF.TO and 0.22% for XDGH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINF.TO and XDGH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer