PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

TINF.TO (TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF) and GEQT.TO (iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TINF.TO returned 13.83%/yr vs 14.52%/yr for GEQT.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINF.TO charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GEQT.TO.

Performance

TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINF.TO achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly lower than GEQT.TO's 18.33% return.

TINF.TO

1D
-1.00%
1M
5.16%
YTD
15.08%
6M
14.84%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
—

GEQT.TO

1D
1.15%
1M
4.70%
YTD
18.33%
6M
17.61%
1Y
29.22%
3Y*
23.67%
5Y*
14.52%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TINF.TO
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF		15.08%14.91%22.73%4.63%3.82%9.89%5.19%
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio		18.33%17.86%25.42%22.35%-15.19%21.99%7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TINF.TO and GEQT.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2020

0.41

TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TINF.TO
GEQT.TO

Utilities

43.3%
1.1%

Industrials

34.9%
5.1%

Energy

21.8%
0.0%

Financial Services

1.8%
33.4%

Basic Materials

-

5.5%

Communication Services

-

1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Healthcare

-

2.3%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Technology

-

44.5%

Utilities

TINF.TO
43.3%
GEQT.TO
1.1%

Industrials

TINF.TO
34.9%
GEQT.TO
5.1%

Energy

TINF.TO
21.8%
GEQT.TO
0.0%

Financial Services

TINF.TO
1.8%
GEQT.TO
33.4%

Basic Materials

TINF.TO

-

GEQT.TO
5.5%

Communication Services

TINF.TO

-

GEQT.TO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TINF.TO

-

GEQT.TO
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

TINF.TO

-

GEQT.TO
2.0%

Healthcare

TINF.TO

-

GEQT.TO
2.3%

Real Estate

TINF.TO

-

GEQT.TO
1.1%

Technology

TINF.TO

-

GEQT.TO
44.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF

iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio

Often compared with TINF.TO:
TINF.TO vs. ZGI.TOTINF.TO vs. XETM.TOTINF.TO vs. HPR.TOTINF.TO vs. VEQT.TOTINF.TO vs. TGRO.TOTINF.TO vs. MEQT.TOTINF.TO vs. TILV.TO
Often compared with GEQT.TO:
GEQT.TO vs. XEQT.TOGEQT.TO vs. GGRO.TOGEQT.TO vs. ZAG.TOGEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TOGEQT.TO vs. XEN.TOGEQT.TO vs. XBAL.TOGEQT.TO vs. VT

Return for Risk

TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TINF.TO
TINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO
GEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TINF.TOGEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.88
2.01

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.54
2.77

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

3.16

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

12.85

-3.05

TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINF.TO and GEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum GEQT.TO drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINF.TO and GEQT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TINF.TOGEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-23.66%

+10.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-9.29%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.23%

-18.02%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.62%

-23.66%

+10.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

0.00%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-5.06%

+2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.28%

-0.26%

Volatility

TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) is 3.00%, while iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that TINF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TINF.TOGEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

5.93%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

12.28%

-3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

14.61%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.89%

17.66%

-5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.05%

17.35%

-5.30%

TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINF.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than GEQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINF.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than GEQT.TO's 1.12% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio		1.12%1.26%1.38%1.58%1.82%1.32%0.87%
TINF.TO
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF		2.55%2.89%2.85%3.39%2.97%2.28%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

TINF.TO and GEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for TINF.TO.

They also come from different issuers: TD and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for TINF.TO and 0.25% for GEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINF.TO and GEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer