PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINF.TO achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly higher than DXN.TO's 13.02% return.


TINF.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.12%
6M
12.63%
YTD
15.17%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.31%

DXN.TO

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.09%
6M
11.21%
YTD
13.02%
1Y
18.26%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$4.12KCA$8.05KCA$14.08K
CA$828.31KCA$888.45KCA$1.07M

TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TINF.TO
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF
15.17%14.91%22.73%4.63%3.82%9.89%5.19%
DXN.TO
Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF
13.02%15.33%15.13%-0.89%-1.00%10.60%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TINF.TO and DXN.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2020

0.44

TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TINF.TO
DXN.TO

Utilities

43.3%
40.6%

Industrials

34.4%
35.0%

Energy

22.4%
20.6%

Financial Services

1.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

TINF.TO
43.3%
DXN.TO
40.6%

Industrials

TINF.TO
34.4%
DXN.TO
35.0%

Energy

TINF.TO
22.4%
DXN.TO
20.6%

Financial Services

TINF.TO
1.8%
DXN.TO
2.4%

Basic Materials

TINF.TO

-

DXN.TO
1.4%

Communication Services

TINF.TO

-

DXN.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

TINF.TO

-

DXN.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

TINF.TO

-

DXN.TO

-

Healthcare

TINF.TO

-

DXN.TO

-

Real Estate

TINF.TO

-

DXN.TO

-

Technology

TINF.TO

-

DXN.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINF.TO
TINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DXN.TO
DXN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DXN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DXN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TINF.TODXN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

2.82

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

8.39

+1.16

TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the DXN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINF.TO and DXN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum DXN.TO drawdown of -34.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINF.TO and DXN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINF.TODXN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-34.85%

+21.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-6.50%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.23%

-14.40%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.62%

-18.55%

+4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-1.87%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-5.72%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

2.18%

-0.10%

Volatility

TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that TINF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINF.TODXN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

2.81%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

8.73%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

11.02%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.86%

12.85%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.03%

16.63%

-4.60%

Dividends

TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Dividend Comparison

TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than DXN.TO's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DXN.TO
Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF
2.00%2.10%3.26%2.30%1.21%0.91%0.35%
TINF.TO
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF
2.54%2.89%2.85%3.39%2.97%2.28%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINF.TO and DXN.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: TD and Dynamic.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINF.TO and DXN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer