TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO
TINF.TO (TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF) and DXN.TO (Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TINF.TO returned 13.26%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for DXN.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINF.TO achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly higher than DXN.TO's 13.02% return.
TINF.TO
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- YTD
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.31%
DXN.TO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- YTD
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 18.26%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$4.12K | CA$8.05K | CA$14.08K | |
| CA$828.31K | CA$888.45K | CA$1.07M |
TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | 15.17% | 14.91% | 22.73% | 4.63% | 3.82% | 9.89% | 5.19% |
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 13.02% | 15.33% | 15.13% | -0.89% | -1.00% | 10.60% | 10.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINF.TO and DXN.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2020 | 0.44 |
TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TINF.TO
DXN.TO
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
TINF.TO
DXN.TO
Industrials
TINF.TO
DXN.TO
Energy
TINF.TO
DXN.TO
Financial Services
TINF.TO
DXN.TO
Basic Materials
TINF.TO
-
DXN.TO
Communication Services
TINF.TO
-
DXN.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
TINF.TO
-
DXN.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
TINF.TO
-
DXN.TO
-
Healthcare
TINF.TO
-
DXN.TO
-
Real Estate
TINF.TO
-
DXN.TO
-
Technology
TINF.TO
-
DXN.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TINF.TO
DXN.TO
TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TINF.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.30 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 2.82 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.54 | 8.39 | +1.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum DXN.TO drawdown of -34.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINF.TO and DXN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINF.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -34.85% | +21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.03% | -6.50% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.23% | -14.40% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.62% | -18.55% | +4.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -1.87% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -5.72% | +3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 2.18% | -0.10% |
Volatility
TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Volatility Comparison
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that TINF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINF.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 2.81% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 8.73% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 11.02% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.86% | 12.85% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 16.63% | -4.60% |
Dividends
TINF.TO vs. DXN.TO - Dividend Comparison
TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than DXN.TO's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.00% | 2.10% | 3.26% | 2.30% | 1.21% | 0.91% | 0.35% |
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | 2.54% | 2.89% | 2.85% | 3.39% | 2.97% | 2.28% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINF.TO and DXN.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: TD and Dynamic.
Find the right allocation for TINF.TO and DXN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer