TINF.TO vs. CIE.NEO
TINF.TO (TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF) and CIE.NEO (iShares International Fundamental Common Class) are both Global Equities funds. TINF.TO is actively managed, while CIE.NEO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TINF.TO returned 12.77%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for CIE.NEO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.73% expense ratio.
Performance
TINF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINF.TO achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than CIE.NEO's 17.83% return.
TINF.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- —
CIE.NEO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 17.83%
- 6M
- 19.92%
- 1Y
- 39.49%
- 3Y*
- 25.09%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
TINF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | 9.87% | 14.91% | 22.73% | 4.63% | 3.82% | 9.89% | 5.19% |
CIE.NEO iShares International Fundamental Common Class | 17.83% | 34.92% | 12.83% | 15.59% | -2.83% | 14.42% | 16.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINF.TO and CIE.NEO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.48 |
The correlation between TINF.TO and CIE.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINF.TO vs. CIE.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
TINF.TO
CIE.NEO
TINF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINF.TO | CIE.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.54 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.57 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.60 | 14.78 | -7.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINF.TO | CIE.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.85 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 1.13 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.44 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
TINF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.48%, smaller than the maximum CIE.NEO drawdown of -40.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINF.TO and CIE.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINF.TO | CIE.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.48% | -40.08% | +26.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.03% | -11.10% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.23% | -15.44% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.48% | -20.55% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -0.39% | -3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -7.13% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 2.68% | -0.72% |
Volatility
TINF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Volatility Comparison
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO) have volatilities of 4.87% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINF.TO | CIE.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 4.85% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 11.56% | -2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.39% | 13.95% | -3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.83% | 13.85% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.02% | 18.19% | -6.17% |
TINF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TINF.TO and CIE.NEO have an expense ratio of 0.73%.
Dividends
TINF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Dividend Comparison
TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than CIE.NEO's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIE.NEO iShares International Fundamental Common Class | 2.12% | 2.53% | 2.82% | 3.08% | 3.32% | 2.89% | 2.15% | 3.63% | 3.12% | 2.67% | 2.80% | 2.44% |
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.85% | 3.39% | 2.97% | 2.28% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINF.TO and CIE.NEO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.73% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TINF.TO and CIE.NEO have the same expense ratio: 0.73% per year.
They also come from different issuers: TD and iShares.
Find the right allocation for TINF.TO and CIE.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer