PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIMB vs. EZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIMB vs. EZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIM S.A. (TIMB) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIMB achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly higher than EZU's 9.10% return.


TIMB

1D
0.54%
1M
1.69%
YTD
15.30%
6M
11.44%
1Y
31.26%
3Y*
22.01%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*

EZU

1D
0.00%
1M
6.05%
YTD
9.10%
6M
10.35%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIMB vs. EZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TIMB
TIM S.A.
15.30%86.96%-33.24%68.57%4.05%-13.46%23.03%
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
9.10%40.00%2.23%23.44%-17.25%13.92%15.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TIMB and EZU is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIMB vs. EZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIMB
TIMB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TIMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TIMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIMB Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EZU
EZU Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIMB vs. EZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIM S.A. (TIMB) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIMBEZUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.55

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.35

5.60

-2.25

TIMB vs. EZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the EZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIMB and EZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIMB vs. EZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIMB drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum EZU drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIMB and EZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIMBEZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.08%

-65.32%

+28.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.82%

-13.06%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.08%

-15.02%

-22.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.08%

-36.11%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.28%

0.00%

-20.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-19.21%

+7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

3.61%

+5.07%

Volatility

TIMB vs. EZU - Volatility Comparison

TIM S.A. (TIMB) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) have volatilities of 6.33% and 6.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIMBEZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

6.52%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.37%

14.88%

+10.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.42%

17.57%

+13.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.55%

19.96%

+11.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.10%

20.50%

+11.60%

Dividends

TIMB vs. EZU - Dividend Comparison

TIMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, more than EZU's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.61%2.85%2.90%2.56%2.79%2.46%2.13%2.84%3.47%1.91%3.07%2.18%
TIMB
TIM S.A.
8.17%11.67%6.03%4.98%4.05%3.43%3.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIMB and EZU have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZU has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to TIMB (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIMB dropped -37.08% vs EZU's -65.32%.

EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIMB and EZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer