PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIMB vs. ERIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TIMB vs. ERIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIM S.A. (TIMB) and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIMB achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly lower than ERIC's 29.07% return.


TIMB

1D
0.54%
1M
1.69%
YTD
15.30%
6M
11.44%
1Y
31.26%
3Y*
22.01%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*

ERIC

1D
1.15%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
29.07%
6M
30.15%
1Y
51.44%
3Y*
37.54%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
8.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIMB vs. ERIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TIMB
TIM S.A.
15.30%86.96%-33.24%68.57%4.05%-13.46%23.03%
ERIC
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
29.07%24.14%33.36%13.40%-44.43%-7.26%10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TIMB and ERIC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TIMB:

$10.65B

ERIC:

$41.05B

EPS

TIMB:

R$9.00

ERIC:

SEK 7.42

PE Ratio

TIMB:

12.63

ERIC:

15.64

PEG Ratio

TIMB:

0.76

ERIC:

0.00

PS Ratio

TIMB:

2.02

ERIC:

1.69

PB Ratio

TIMB:

2.22

ERIC:

3.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

TIMB:

R$27.04B

ERIC:

SEK 229.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TIMB:

R$14.61B

ERIC:

SEK 110.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

TIMB:

R$13.92B

ERIC:

SEK 46.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIMB vs. ERIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIMB
TIMB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TIMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TIMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIMB Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ERIC
ERIC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ERIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERIC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ERIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERIC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIMB vs. ERIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIM S.A. (TIMB) and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIMBERICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.30

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.14

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.35

7.76

-4.40

TIMB vs. ERIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the ERIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIMB and ERIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIMB vs. ERIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIMB drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum ERIC drawdown of -98.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIMB and ERIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIMBERICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.08%

-98.59%

+61.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.82%

-15.79%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.08%

-22.61%

-14.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.08%

-63.96%

+26.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.28%

-82.52%

+62.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-67.77%

+55.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

6.38%

+2.30%

Volatility

TIMB vs. ERIC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIM S.A. (TIMB) is 6.33%, while Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) has a volatility of 14.05%. This indicates that TIMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIMBERICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

14.05%

-7.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.37%

24.72%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.42%

36.24%

-4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.55%

34.63%

-3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.10%

35.26%

-3.16%

Dividends

TIMB vs. ERIC - Dividend Comparison

TIMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, more than ERIC's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERIC
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
2.55%3.04%3.22%4.07%4.22%2.15%1.36%1.24%1.42%1.67%5.14%5.30%
TIMB
TIM S.A.
8.17%11.67%6.03%4.98%4.05%3.43%3.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TIMB vs. ERIC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TIM S.A. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
6.81B
51.13B
(TIMB) Total Revenue
(ERIC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TIMB values in BRL, ERIC values in SEK

TIMB vs. ERIC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TIM S.A. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
52.4%
48.1%
Portfolio components
TIMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TIM S.A. reported a gross profit of 3.56B and revenue of 6.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.

ERIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported a gross profit of 24.60B and revenue of 51.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.1%.

TIMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TIM S.A. reported an operating income of 1.57B and revenue of 6.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

ERIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported an operating income of 5.48B and revenue of 51.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

TIMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TIM S.A. reported a net income of 817.09M and revenue of 6.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

ERIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported a net income of 920.33M and revenue of 51.13B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TIMB and ERIC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERIC has higher volatility (14.05%) compared to TIMB (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIMB dropped -37.08% vs ERIC's -98.59%.

ERIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIMB and ERIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer