TILVX vs. FDETX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX).
TILVX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. FDETX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 30, 1985.
Performance
TILVX vs. FDETX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TILVX vs. FDETX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILVX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund | -0.04% | 15.81% | 14.26% | 11.49% | -7.57% | 25.05% | 2.90% | 26.48% | -8.38% | 10.93% |
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O | -5.03% | 27.60% | 27.07% | 24.20% | -8.00% | 25.32% | 9.12% | 31.39% | -9.09% | 16.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILVX achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly higher than FDETX's -5.03% return. Over the past 10 years, TILVX has underperformed FDETX with an annualized return of 9.99%, while FDETX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.
TILVX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 13.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
FDETX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -5.03%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 24.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 14.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TILVX vs. FDETX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILVX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FDETX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TILVX vs. FDETX — Risk / Return Rank
TILVX
FDETX
TILVX vs. FDETX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TILVX | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 1.34 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.90 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 1.78 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 8.19 | -3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TILVX | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.34 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.83 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.78 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.62 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between TILVX and FDETX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TILVX vs. FDETX - Dividend Comparison
TILVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, less than FDETX's 10.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILVX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund | 5.96% | 5.96% | 3.04% | 4.90% | 4.57% | 3.77% | 2.26% | 7.05% | 4.68% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 4.24% |
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O | 10.89% | 10.34% | 8.95% | 4.39% | 5.66% | 5.63% | 4.47% | 7.46% | 15.81% | 5.34% | 2.92% | 5.97% |
Drawdowns
TILVX vs. FDETX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILVX drawdown since its inception was -60.05%, smaller than the maximum FDETX drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILVX and FDETX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILVX | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.05% | -66.86% | +6.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.79% | -12.42% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.00% | -21.72% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.15% | -36.61% | -3.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.80% | -9.64% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -11.26% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.70% | -0.21% |
Volatility
TILVX vs. FDETX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) is 3.65%, while Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that TILVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDETX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TILVX | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 4.48% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 9.55% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.66% | 18.39% | -2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 17.56% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 18.82% | -1.18% |