TILIX vs. RBCGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TILIX (TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) and RBCGX (Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TILIX returned 18.64%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for RBCGX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TILIX charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for RBCGX.

Performance

TILIX vs. RBCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) and Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TILIX having a 8.58% return and RBCGX slightly lower at 8.28%. Over the past 10 years, TILIX has outperformed RBCGX with an annualized return of 18.64%, while RBCGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.31% annualized return.

TILIX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 7.10%
• YTD: 8.58%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: 27.30%
• 3Y*: 25.49%
• 5Y*: 16.00%
• 10Y*: 18.64%

RBCGX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 6.12%
• YTD: 8.28%
• 6M: 6.26%
• 1Y: 19.74%
• 3Y*: 23.49%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILIX vs. RBCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TILIX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	8.58%	18.41%	33.31%	42.64%	-29.22%	27.63%	38.43%	36.30%	-1.66%	28.49%
RBCGX Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund	8.28%	14.42%	33.73%	28.83%	-30.06%	-3.63%	43.98%	25.52%	-3.81%	24.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TILIX and RBCGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002	0.89

The correlation between TILIX and RBCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TILIX vs. RBCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILIX

TILIX Risk / Return Rank: 31
TILIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
TILIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
TILIX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
TILIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
TILIX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

RBCGX

RBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 21
RBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
RBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
RBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
RBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
RBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILIX vs. RBCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) and Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TILIX	RBCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.48	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.05	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.26	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.42	+0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.84	3.77	+2.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TILIX vs. RBCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the RBCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILIX and RBCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TILIX	RBCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	1.48	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.34	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.60	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.42	+0.19

Drawdowns

TILIX vs. RBCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILIX drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum RBCGX drawdown of -77.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILIX and RBCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TILIX	RBCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.54%	-77.12%	+26.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.24%	-14.55%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.33%	-17.27%	-6.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.68%	-45.47%	+12.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.68%	-45.47%	+12.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-0.26%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.73%	-24.39%	+16.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.84%	5.46%	-0.62%

Volatility

TILIX vs. RBCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) is 3.32%, while Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that TILIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TILIX	RBCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	3.59%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.60%	8.84%	+2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.42%	13.91%	+1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.47%	19.88%	+1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.09%	20.54%	+0.55%

TILIX vs. RBCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RBCGX's 1.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

TILIX vs. RBCGX - Dividend Comparison

TILIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than RBCGX's 15.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RBCGX Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund	15.41%	16.69%	7.84%	0.00%	6.27%	7.33%	9.93%	4.67%	21.03%	8.16%	9.06%	6.53%
TILIX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	4.06%	4.41%	3.25%	1.90%	11.00%	8.76%	1.91%	2.38%	4.01%	0.68%	1.33%	1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TILIX and RBCGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, TILIX and RBCGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TILIX or RBCGX?

RBCGX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to TILIX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILIX dropped -50.54% vs RBCGX's -77.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TILIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.