PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILIX vs. QISGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILIX vs. QISGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILIX achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly lower than QISGX's 19.02% return. Over the past 10 years, TILIX has outperformed QISGX with an annualized return of 18.64%, while QISGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.62% annualized return.


TILIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.58%
6M
7.86%
1Y
27.30%
3Y*
25.49%
5Y*
16.00%
10Y*
18.64%

QISGX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.07%
YTD
19.02%
6M
20.78%
1Y
46.69%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILIX vs. QISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
8.58%18.41%33.31%42.64%-29.22%27.63%38.43%36.30%-1.66%28.49%
QISGX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund
19.02%17.72%15.63%19.63%-27.94%18.14%29.91%21.14%-6.33%25.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TILIX and QISGX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between TILIX and QISGX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILIX vs. QISGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILIX
TILIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TILIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TILIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

QISGX
QISGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILIX vs. QISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILIXQISGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.55

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.84

13.27

-7.43

TILIX vs. QISGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the QISGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILIX and QISGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILIXQISGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.29

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.38

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.55

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.40

+0.21

Drawdowns

TILIX vs. QISGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILIX drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum QISGX drawdown of -60.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILIX and QISGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILIXQISGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.54%

-60.75%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.24%

-13.23%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

-27.28%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-38.60%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

-45.08%

+12.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.26%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-13.89%

+6.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

3.53%

+1.31%

Volatility

TILIX vs. QISGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) is 3.32%, while Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that TILIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILIXQISGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

6.04%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

15.86%

-4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

20.49%

-5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

24.48%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.09%

24.69%

-3.60%

TILIX vs. QISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QISGX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TILIX vs. QISGX - Dividend Comparison

TILIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than QISGX's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QISGX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund
3.29%3.91%0.00%0.05%3.63%29.34%0.45%0.00%7.03%5.09%1.61%18.51%
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
4.06%4.41%3.25%1.90%11.00%8.76%1.91%2.38%4.01%0.68%1.33%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


TILIX and QISGX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QISGX has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to TILIX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILIX dropped -50.54% vs QISGX's -60.75%.

QISGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILIX and QISGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer