PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILIX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILIX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TILIX having a 8.58% return and FSPGX slightly higher at 8.60%.


TILIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.58%
6M
7.86%
1Y
27.30%
3Y*
25.49%
5Y*
16.00%
10Y*
18.64%

FSPGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.60%
6M
7.98%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILIX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
8.58%18.41%33.31%42.64%-29.22%27.63%38.43%36.30%-1.66%27.42%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
8.60%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between TILIX and FSPGX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

1.00

The correlation between TILIX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILIX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILIX
TILIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TILIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TILIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILIX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILIXFSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.76

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.84

5.90

-0.06

TILIX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILIX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILIXFSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.85

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.75

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.90

-0.29

Drawdowns

TILIX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILIX drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILIX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILIXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.54%

-32.66%

-17.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.24%

-16.17%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

-23.32%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-32.66%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.38%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-6.37%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

4.81%

+0.03%

Volatility

TILIX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILIXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.32%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

11.58%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

15.39%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

21.49%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.09%

21.55%

-0.46%

TILIX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TILIX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

TILIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.32%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%0.00%0.00%
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
4.06%4.41%3.25%1.90%11.00%8.76%1.91%2.38%4.01%0.68%1.33%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TILIX and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to TILIX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILIX dropped -50.54% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILIX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer