PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILCX vs. TRMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILCX vs. TRMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TILCX having a 15.11% return and TRMCX slightly higher at 15.42%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TILCX having a 11.05% annualized return and TRMCX not far ahead at 11.37%.


TILCX

1D
0.65%
1M
4.35%
YTD
15.11%
6M
17.21%
1Y
26.91%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
11.05%

TRMCX

1D
0.87%
1M
3.69%
YTD
15.42%
6M
15.34%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILCX vs. TRMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TILCX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund
15.11%11.82%11.32%9.64%-5.10%25.89%3.08%26.67%-9.38%16.81%
TRMCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund
15.42%6.16%16.21%18.99%-4.16%24.51%9.84%19.59%-10.66%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TILCX and TRMCX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2000

0.93

The correlation between TILCX and TRMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILCX vs. TRMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILCX
TILCX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TILCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TILCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

TRMCX
TRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILCX vs. TRMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILCXTRMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.35

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

2.98

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.93

11.26

+3.67

TILCX vs. TRMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the TRMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILCX and TRMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILCXTRMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.98

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.54

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.58

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.63

-0.17

Drawdowns

TILCX vs. TRMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILCX drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, roughly equal to the maximum TRMCX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILCX and TRMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILCXTRMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.60%

-55.28%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-9.41%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.55%

-29.60%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.95%

-29.60%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.85%

-39.41%

-0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.08%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-6.64%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.48%

-0.65%

Volatility

TILCX vs. TRMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) is 3.32%, while T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that TILCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILCXTRMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.61%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

10.54%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

14.14%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

19.28%

-4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

19.64%

-2.05%

TILCX vs. TRMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILCX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than TRMCX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

TILCX vs. TRMCX - Dividend Comparison

TILCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.12%, more than TRMCX's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TILCX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund
11.12%12.80%8.32%8.41%19.17%6.88%3.05%5.67%7.61%4.79%4.10%6.02%
TRMCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund
4.70%5.43%14.20%7.65%13.92%9.22%3.79%4.25%12.13%6.58%6.74%11.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


TILCX and TRMCX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRMCX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to TILCX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILCX dropped -57.60% vs TRMCX's -55.28%.

TILCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILCX and TRMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer