PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILCX vs. PRWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILCX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILCX achieves a 17.34% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's 4.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TILCX having a 11.63% annualized return and PRWCX not far behind at 11.36%.


TILCX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.93%
YTD
17.34%
6M
17.05%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.63%

PRWCX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
4.53%
6M
4.44%
1Y
12.48%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILCX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TILCX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund
17.34%11.82%11.32%9.64%-5.10%25.89%3.08%26.67%-9.38%16.81%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
4.53%12.45%12.50%18.85%-12.00%18.45%18.13%24.62%0.63%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TILCX and PRWCX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2000

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between TILCX and PRWCX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILCX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILCX
TILCX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TILCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TILCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWCX
PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILCX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TILCXPRWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.31

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

2.07

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.98

8.70

+7.28

TILCX vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILCX and PRWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TILCX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILCX drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, which is greater than PRWCX's maximum drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILCX and PRWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILCXPRWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.60%

-41.77%

-15.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-6.32%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.55%

-15.96%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.95%

-17.07%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.85%

-26.86%

-12.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-1.58%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-3.33%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.50%

+0.34%

Volatility

TILCX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 2.80%. This indicates that TILCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILCXPRWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

2.80%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

6.47%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

7.81%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

12.79%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

12.76%

+4.85%

TILCX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILCX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TILCX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

TILCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, more than PRWCX's 8.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
8.43%8.81%10.38%4.15%9.44%9.23%7.97%5.83%7.46%6.82%3.51%9.86%
TILCX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund
10.91%12.80%8.32%8.41%19.17%6.88%3.05%5.67%7.61%4.79%4.10%6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


TILCX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TILCX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to PRWCX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILCX dropped -57.60% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.

TILCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILCX and PRWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer