TILCX vs. HFCVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TILCX (T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund) and HFCVX (Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TILCX returned 11.05%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for HFCVX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TILCX charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for HFCVX.

Performance

TILCX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILCX achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly higher than HFCVX's 13.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TILCX having a 11.05% annualized return and HFCVX not far ahead at 11.15%.

TILCX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 4.35%
• YTD: 15.11%
• 6M: 17.21%
• 1Y: 26.91%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 9.24%
• 10Y*: 11.05%

HFCVX

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 13.70%
• 6M: 14.88%
• 1Y: 26.29%
• 3Y*: 16.75%
• 5Y*: 11.74%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILCX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TILCX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund	15.11%	11.82%	11.32%	9.64%	-5.10%	25.89%	3.08%	26.67%	-9.38%	16.81%
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund	13.70%	18.27%	9.59%	5.81%	6.12%	29.94%	-6.39%	20.84%	-9.50%	19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TILCX and HFCVX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2000	0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between TILCX and HFCVX has dropped to 0.70 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TILCX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILCX

TILCX Risk / Return Rank: 77
TILCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TILCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
TILCX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
TILCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
TILCX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

HFCVX

HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 89
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILCX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TILCX	HFCVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	2.91	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	4.22	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.51	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	7.07	-3.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.93	21.66	-6.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TILCX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILCX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TILCX	HFCVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	2.91	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.89	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.68	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.41	+0.06

Drawdowns

TILCX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILCX drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILCX and HFCVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TILCX	HFCVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.60%	-65.75%	+8.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.00%	-3.77%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.55%	-11.32%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.95%	-16.81%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.85%	-39.39%	-0.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-1.29%	+0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-8.24%	+0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	1.23%	+0.60%

Volatility

TILCX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) at 2.79%. This indicates that TILCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TILCX	HFCVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	2.79%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.28%	6.85%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.78%	9.16%	+1.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.88%	13.26%	+1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.59%	16.46%	+1.13%

TILCX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILCX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

TILCX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

TILCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.12%, more than HFCVX's 6.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund	6.50%	7.39%	4.56%	3.57%	10.33%	4.81%	2.58%	6.58%	17.16%	14.97%	2.26%	2.57%
TILCX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund	11.12%	12.80%	8.32%	8.41%	19.17%	6.88%	3.05%	5.67%	7.61%	4.79%	4.10%	6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TILCX and HFCVX in my portfolio?

TILCX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TILCX or HFCVX?

TILCX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to HFCVX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILCX dropped -57.60% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.