TIIUX vs. MCDWX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TIIUX (Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Core Fixed Income Fund) and MCDWX (Manning & Napier Credit Series) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, TIIUX returned -0.69%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for MCDWX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TIIUX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for MCDWX.

Performance

TIIUX vs. MCDWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Core Fixed Income Fund (TIIUX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIIUX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than MCDWX's 0.56% return.

TIIUX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 6M: 0.44%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 3.29%
• 5Y*: -0.69%
• 10Y*: 1.43%

MCDWX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.91%
• 1Y: 5.23%
• 3Y*: 5.54%
• 5Y*: 1.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIIUX vs. MCDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TIIUX Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Core Fixed Income Fund	0.20%	5.77%	0.61%	5.90%	-14.72%	-1.70%	5.50%
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	0.56%	7.57%	4.13%	7.31%	-11.13%	0.01%	8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TIIUX and MCDWX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020	0.90

The correlation between TIIUX and MCDWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TIIUX vs. MCDWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIIUX

TIIUX Risk / Return Rank: 15
TIIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TIIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
TIIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
TIIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TIIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

MCDWX

MCDWX Risk / Return Rank: 39
MCDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
MCDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MCDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MCDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MCDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIIUX vs. MCDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Core Fixed Income Fund (TIIUX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TIIUX	MCDWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.72	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	2.49	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.34	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	2.32	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	7.49	-3.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TIIUX vs. MCDWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIIUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the MCDWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIIUX and MCDWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TIIUX	MCDWX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	1.72	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	0.34	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.59	+0.37

Drawdowns

TIIUX vs. MCDWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIIUX drawdown since its inception was -20.21%, which is greater than MCDWX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIIUX and MCDWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIIUX	MCDWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.21%	-15.96%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.85%	-2.17%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.15%	-4.22%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.00%	-15.96%	-4.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.34%	-0.95%	-4.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.41%	-4.15%	+1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	0.67%	+0.43%

Volatility

TIIUX vs. MCDWX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Core Fixed Income Fund (TIIUX) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) at 1.04%. This indicates that TIIUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIIUX	MCDWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.40%	1.04%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.84%	2.16%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.25%	2.94%	+1.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.27%	4.63%	+1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.15%	4.37%	+0.78%

TIIUX vs. MCDWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIIUX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than MCDWX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

TIIUX vs. MCDWX - Dividend Comparison

TIIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than MCDWX's 4.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	4.47%	4.83%	4.41%	4.48%	3.25%	4.45%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TIIUX Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Core Fixed Income Fund	3.34%	2.92%	4.51%	3.91%	2.88%	2.36%	5.77%	3.08%	2.93%	2.49%	3.60%	3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TIIUX and MCDWX in my portfolio?

TIIUX and MCDWX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TIIUX or MCDWX?

TIIUX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to MCDWX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIIUX dropped -20.21% vs MCDWX's -15.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCDWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.