TIILX vs. IPBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund (TIILX) and Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX).
TIILX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 30, 2002. IPBAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Feb 27, 2003.
Performance
TIILX vs. IPBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TIILX vs. IPBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIILX TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund | 0.56% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 4.35% | -7.22% | 5.26% | 8.10% | 6.60% | -0.49% | 1.74% |
IPBAX Allspring Real Return Fund | 11.78% | 10.37% | 8.12% | 5.35% | -10.75% | 7.74% | 8.03% | 9.87% | -4.02% | 4.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIILX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than IPBAX's 11.78% return. Over the past 10 years, TIILX has underperformed IPBAX with an annualized return of 2.85%, while IPBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.92% annualized return.
TIILX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
IPBAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 23.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TIILX vs. IPBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIILX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than IPBAX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TIILX vs. IPBAX — Risk / Return Rank
TIILX
IPBAX
TIILX vs. IPBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund (TIILX) and Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIILX | IPBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 2.91 | -1.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 3.98 | -2.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.53 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 6.12 | -3.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 22.57 | -13.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIILX | IPBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 2.91 | -1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.89 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.83 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between TIILX and IPBAX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TIILX vs. IPBAX - Dividend Comparison
TIILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than IPBAX's 2.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIILX TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund | 3.12% | 3.95% | 3.45% | 3.38% | 8.60% | 6.29% | 1.28% | 1.85% | 2.59% | 2.00% | 1.55% | 0.33% |
IPBAX Allspring Real Return Fund | 2.33% | 2.58% | 2.26% | 3.71% | 5.07% | 3.84% | 1.26% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.77% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
TIILX vs. IPBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIILX drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, smaller than the maximum IPBAX drawdown of -15.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIILX and IPBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIILX | IPBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.24% | -15.13% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.12% | -3.84% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | -13.94% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.57% | -13.94% | +4.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.38% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -3.15% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 1.04% | -0.51% |
Volatility
TIILX vs. IPBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund (TIILX) is 1.02%, while Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that TIILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TIILX | IPBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 3.22% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.75% | 6.48% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18% | 8.01% | -4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 7.12% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.83% | 5.93% | -2.10% |