TIILX vs. EARRX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund (TIILX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX).
TIILX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 30, 2002. EARRX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 31, 2010.
Performance
TIILX vs. EARRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TIILX vs. EARRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIILX TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund | 0.56% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 4.35% | -7.22% | 5.26% | 8.10% | 6.60% | -0.49% | 1.74% |
EARRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A | 0.28% | 5.46% | 5.39% | 5.95% | -3.22% | 7.50% | 5.05% | 5.29% | -0.49% | 1.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIILX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than EARRX's 0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, TIILX has underperformed EARRX with an annualized return of 2.85%, while EARRX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.60% annualized return.
TIILX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
EARRX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 2.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 3.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TIILX vs. EARRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIILX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than EARRX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TIILX vs. EARRX — Risk / Return Rank
TIILX
EARRX
TIILX vs. EARRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund (TIILX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIILX | EARRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.60 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 2.29 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.76 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 12.19 | -3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIILX | EARRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.60 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.37 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 1.33 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.04 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between TIILX and EARRX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TIILX vs. EARRX - Dividend Comparison
TIILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than EARRX's 3.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIILX TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund | 3.12% | 3.95% | 3.45% | 3.38% | 8.60% | 6.29% | 1.28% | 1.85% | 2.59% | 2.00% | 1.55% | 0.33% |
EARRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A | 3.87% | 4.36% | 3.83% | 4.24% | 4.82% | 3.32% | 2.02% | 2.46% | 2.67% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 1.73% |
Drawdowns
TIILX vs. EARRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIILX drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, which is greater than EARRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIILX and EARRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIILX | EARRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.24% | -10.27% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.12% | -1.18% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | -6.39% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.57% | -10.27% | +0.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.51% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -1.09% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.27% | +0.26% |
Volatility
TIILX vs. EARRX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund (TIILX) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) at 0.58%. This indicates that TIILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EARRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TIILX | EARRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 0.58% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.75% | 1.05% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18% | 1.87% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 2.78% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.83% | 2.71% | +1.12% |