TIGR.L vs. LDGL.L
TIGR.L (L&G India INR Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and LDGL.L (L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - TIGR.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the L&G India INR Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing, while LDGL.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TIGR.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for LDGL.L.
Performance
TIGR.L vs. LDGL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TIGR.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- -10.05%
- 3Y*
- -0.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDGL.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIGR.L vs. LDGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TIGR.L L&G India INR Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing | -6.29% |
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIGR.L and LDGL.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIGR.L vs. LDGL.L — Risk / Return Rank
TIGR.L
LDGL.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TIGR.L vs. LDGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G India INR Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (TIGR.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIGR.L | LDGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIGR.L vs. LDGL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIGR.L drawdown since its inception was -15.01%, which is greater than LDGL.L's maximum drawdown of -9.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGR.L and LDGL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIGR.L | LDGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.01% | -9.46% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.35% | 0.00% | -11.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -2.37% | -2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.89% | — | — |
Volatility
TIGR.L vs. LDGL.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIGR.L | LDGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.19% | 14.29% | -6.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.35% | 14.29% | -7.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.35% | 14.29% | -7.94% |
TIGR.L vs. LDGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIGR.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than LDGL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIGR.L vs. LDGL.L - Dividend Comparison
TIGR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than LDGL.L's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIGR.L L&G India INR Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 3.54% | 6.72% | 6.50% | 6.26% | 4.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIGR.L and LDGL.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDGL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDGL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TIGR.L.
TIGR.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while LDGL.L is Global Equity Income. TIGR.L tracks L&G India INR Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing, while LDGL.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TIGR.L and 0.29% for LDGL.L.
Find the right allocation for TIGR.L and LDGL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer