TICRX vs. ALSMX
TICRX (Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Equity Fund Class A) and ALSMX (Archer Multi Cap Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TICRX returned 11.76%/yr vs 13.86%/yr for ALSMX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TICRX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for ALSMX.
Performance
TICRX vs. ALSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TICRX achieves a 13.50% return, which is significantly lower than ALSMX's 26.71% return.
TICRX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 13.50%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
ALSMX
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 26.71%
- 6M
- 25.30%
- 1Y
- 42.63%
- 3Y*
- 25.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- —
TICRX vs. ALSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TICRX Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Equity Fund Class A | 13.50% | 16.21% | 17.86% | 22.23% | -18.02% | 26.24% | 19.99% |
ALSMX Archer Multi Cap Fund | 26.71% | 11.47% | 21.78% | 25.14% | -20.12% | 16.58% | 16.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TICRX and ALSMX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020 | 0.92 |
The correlation between TICRX and ALSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TICRX vs. ALSMX — Risk / Return Rank
TICRX
ALSMX
TICRX vs. ALSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Equity Fund Class A (TICRX) and Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TICRX | ALSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 2.74 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 3.72 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.48 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 4.69 | -1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 20.53 | -7.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TICRX | ALSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.74 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.01 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.01 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
TICRX vs. ALSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TICRX drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, smaller than the maximum ALSMX drawdown of -97.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TICRX and ALSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TICRX | ALSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.74% | -97.87% | +43.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -9.42% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.13% | -97.87% | +67.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.13% | -97.87% | +67.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -96.39% | +96.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -27.98% | +20.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.15% | -0.05% |
Volatility
TICRX vs. ALSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Equity Fund Class A (TICRX) is 3.02%, while Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that TICRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TICRX | ALSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 5.13% | -2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 13.27% | -3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 16.14% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 1,291.55% | -1,271.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 1,140.59% | -1,120.83% |
TICRX vs. ALSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TICRX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ALSMX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
TICRX vs. ALSMX - Dividend Comparison
TICRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%, more than ALSMX's 5.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSMX Archer Multi Cap Fund | 5.65% | 7.16% | 3.62% | 0.46% | 7.12% | 1.62% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TICRX Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Equity Fund Class A | 8.05% | 9.14% | 19.79% | 6.32% | 5.51% | 10.60% | 1.32% | 5.21% | 10.73% | 2.65% | 7.10% | 3.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TICRX and ALSMX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALSMX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to TICRX (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TICRX dropped -54.74% vs ALSMX's -97.87%.
ALSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TICRX and ALSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer