TIBWX vs. UDBPX
TIBWX (TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund) and UDBPX (UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, TIBWX returned 1.11%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for UDBPX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TIBWX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UDBPX.
Performance
TIBWX vs. UDBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIBWX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than UDBPX's 0.16% return.
TIBWX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 3.28%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
UDBPX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- —
TIBWX vs. UDBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIBWX TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund | 0.68% | 4.24% | 4.60% | 9.06% | -11.39% | -2.19% | 4.81% | 9.96% | 1.01% |
UDBPX UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund | 0.16% | 6.96% | 1.55% | 4.53% | -10.41% | -2.43% | 6.80% | 6.79% | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIBWX and UDBPX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018 | 0.68 |
The correlation between TIBWX and UDBPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIBWX vs. UDBPX — Risk / Return Rank
TIBWX
UDBPX
TIBWX vs. UDBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) and UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIBWX | UDBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 1.84 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | 5.63 | -2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIBWX | UDBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.07 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.44 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
TIBWX vs. UDBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIBWX drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, which is greater than UDBPX's maximum drawdown of -15.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBWX and UDBPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIBWX | UDBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -15.45% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -2.25% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.99% | -4.03% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.06% | -14.55% | -1.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.33% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -5.11% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.73% | +0.22% |
Volatility
TIBWX vs. UDBPX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) and UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) have volatilities of 1.05% and 1.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIBWX | UDBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 1.05% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.25% | 2.35% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59% | 3.47% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 4.99% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 4.50% | -1.19% |
TIBWX vs. UDBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIBWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than UDBPX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIBWX vs. UDBPX - Dividend Comparison
TIBWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than UDBPX's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIBWX TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund | 1.52% | 1.53% | 1.95% | 0.24% | 11.88% | 2.03% | 2.75% | 5.40% | 3.93% | 1.47% |
UDBPX UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund | 3.61% | 3.12% | 2.84% | 2.15% | 1.46% | 1.03% | 4.11% | 2.69% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIBWX and UDBPX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UDBPX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to TIBWX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIBWX dropped -16.47% vs UDBPX's -15.45%.
TIBWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIBWX and UDBPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer