TIBDX vs. SSASX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) and State Street Income Fund (SSASX).

TIBDX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Jul 1, 1999. SSASX is managed by State Street. It was launched on Jan 2, 1980.

Performance

TIBDX vs. SSASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) and State Street Income Fund (SSASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TIBDX vs. SSASX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund	-0.48%	7.38%	1.95%	5.63%	-13.68%	0.94%
SSASX State Street Income Fund	-0.41%	7.49%	-0.95%	4.83%	-13.74%	0.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIBDX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than SSASX's -0.41% return.

TIBDX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: -0.48%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 3.86%
• 3Y*: 3.70%
• 5Y*: 0.18%
• 10Y*: 2.01%

SSASX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: -0.41%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: 3.60%
• 3Y*: 2.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIBDX vs. SSASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIBDX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SSASX's 0.20% expense ratio.

TIBDX

TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund

SSASX

State Street Income Fund

Return for Risk

TIBDX vs. SSASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIBDX

TIBDX Risk / Return Rank: 49
TIBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
TIBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
TIBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
TIBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
TIBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

SSASX

SSASX Risk / Return Rank: 30
SSASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SSASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
SSASX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
SSASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SSASX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIBDX vs. SSASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) and State Street Income Fund (SSASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TIBDX	SSASX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	0.82	+0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	1.18	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.15	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	1.45	+0.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.37	3.96	+1.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TIBDX vs. SSASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIBDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the SSASX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIBDX and SSASX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TIBDX	SSASX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	0.82	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	-0.11	+1.06

Correlation

The correlation between TIBDX and SSASX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TIBDX vs. SSASX - Dividend Comparison

TIBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than SSASX's 3.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund	4.03%	4.34%	3.60%	3.22%	2.44%	2.39%	4.45%	3.09%	2.88%	2.93%	3.80%	4.68%
SSASX State Street Income Fund	3.65%	4.01%	2.76%	2.86%	2.48%	3.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TIBDX vs. SSASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIBDX drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, roughly equal to the maximum SSASX drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBDX and SSASX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIBDX	SSASX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.82%	-19.65%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.98%	-3.12%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.34%	-5.65%	+3.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	-9.83%	+7.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	1.14%	-0.18%

Volatility

TIBDX vs. SSASX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) and State Street Income Fund (SSASX) have volatilities of 1.54% and 1.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIBDX	SSASX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	1.58%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.56%	2.76%	-0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.25%	4.81%	-0.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.59%	6.56%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.71%	6.56%	-1.85%