TIBDX vs. SMTRX
TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) and SMTRX (ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TIBDX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for SMTRX.
Performance
TIBDX vs. SMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TIBDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.99%
SMTRX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIBDX vs. SMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 0.38% |
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIBDX and SMTRX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIBDX vs. SMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
TIBDX
SMTRX
TIBDX vs. SMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) and ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund (SMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIBDX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIBDX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 5.86 | -4.91 |
Drawdowns
TIBDX vs. SMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIBDX drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, which is greater than SMTRX's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBDX and SMTRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIBDX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -0.10% | -18.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | 0.00% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -0.03% | -2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility
TIBDX vs. SMTRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIBDX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90% | 1.90% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 1.90% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.73% | 1.90% | +2.83% |
TIBDX vs. SMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIBDX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SMTRX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIBDX vs. SMTRX - Dividend Comparison
TIBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than SMTRX's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 4.45% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 3.22% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 4.45% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 3.80% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIBDX and SMTRX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TIBDX and SMTRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer