PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THW vs. GXXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THW vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THW achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than GXXIX's 6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, THW has underperformed GXXIX with an annualized return of 9.09%, while GXXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.74% annualized return.


THW

1D
-2.15%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
0.57%
6M
2.45%
1Y
31.64%
3Y*
6.83%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
9.09%

GXXIX

1D
0.82%
1M
4.39%
YTD
6.73%
6M
5.69%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
14.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THW vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
0.57%31.10%5.35%-11.52%-1.21%12.03%26.40%32.98%-5.40%16.95%
GXXIX
abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
6.73%3.82%10.11%15.19%-26.55%81.37%29.56%36.96%-6.73%20.42%

Correlation

The correlation between THW and GXXIX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.52

The correlation between THW and GXXIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THW vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THW
THW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
THW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
THW Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
THW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
THW Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

GXXIX
GXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THW vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THWGXXIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

1.12

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

1.64

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

1.13

+1.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.92

4.36

+5.56

THW vs. GXXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THW Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the GXXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THW and GXXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THWGXXIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.12

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.43

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.62

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.65

-0.38

Drawdowns

THW vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THW drawdown since its inception was -37.36%, which is greater than GXXIX's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THW and GXXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THWGXXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.36%

-33.65%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-11.78%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.48%

-19.74%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.53%

-33.65%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.36%

-33.65%

-3.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.88%

0.00%

-4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-6.16%

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.06%

+0.14%

Volatility

THW vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 2.93%. This indicates that THW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THWGXXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

2.93%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

9.35%

+3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

11.90%

+8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

27.77%

-9.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

23.72%

-2.52%

THW vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THW has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

THW vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison

THW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%, more than GXXIX's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXXIX
abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
2.15%2.30%0.00%0.28%0.39%59.39%14.10%9.76%12.93%10.11%12.20%5.82%
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
11.41%10.96%12.72%12.00%9.56%8.60%8.85%10.11%12.08%10.29%10.91%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


THW and GXXIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THW has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to GXXIX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THW dropped -37.36% vs GXXIX's -33.65%.

THW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THW and GXXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer