PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THW vs. FBTTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THW vs. FBTTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THW achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than FBTTX's -0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, THW has underperformed FBTTX with an annualized return of 9.09%, while FBTTX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.20% annualized return.


THW

1D
-2.15%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
0.57%
6M
2.45%
1Y
31.64%
3Y*
6.83%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
9.09%

FBTTX

1D
-3.06%
1M
-5.59%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-4.29%
1Y
43.95%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THW vs. FBTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
0.57%31.10%5.35%-11.52%-1.21%12.03%26.40%32.98%-5.40%16.95%
FBTTX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M
-0.94%39.21%5.08%10.43%-8.22%-3.35%31.82%25.39%-4.19%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between THW and FBTTX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.53

The correlation between THW and FBTTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THW vs. FBTTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THW
THW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
THW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
THW Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
THW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
THW Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTTX
FBTTX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FBTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THW vs. FBTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THWFBTTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

2.08

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

2.85

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

5.12

-2.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.92

14.99

-5.07

THW vs. FBTTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THW Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FBTTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THW and FBTTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THWFBTTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

2.08

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.38

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.42

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.29

-0.02

Drawdowns

THW vs. FBTTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THW drawdown since its inception was -37.36%, smaller than the maximum FBTTX drawdown of -63.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THW and FBTTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THWFBTTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.36%

-63.75%

+26.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-8.94%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.48%

-32.91%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.53%

-36.64%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.36%

-39.04%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.88%

-8.94%

+4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-21.83%

+12.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.05%

+0.15%

Volatility

THW vs. FBTTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) is 5.05%, while Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that THW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THWFBTTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

7.09%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

16.71%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

22.10%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

23.46%

-4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

24.41%

-3.21%

THW vs. FBTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THW has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTTX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

THW vs. FBTTX - Dividend Comparison

THW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%, more than FBTTX's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBTTX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M
1.55%1.53%6.41%0.93%0.00%21.60%8.79%7.10%2.64%0.00%0.00%5.42%
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
11.41%10.96%12.72%12.00%9.56%8.60%8.85%10.11%12.08%10.29%10.91%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


THW and FBTTX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTTX has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to THW (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THW dropped -37.36% vs FBTTX's -63.75%.

FBTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THW and FBTTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer