PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THW vs. FBTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THW vs. FBTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C (FBTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THW achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than FBTCX's -1.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with THW having a 9.09% annualized return and FBTCX not far behind at 8.99%.


THW

1D
-2.15%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
0.57%
6M
2.45%
1Y
31.64%
3Y*
6.83%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
9.09%

FBTCX

1D
-3.07%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
-1.15%
6M
-4.56%
1Y
43.21%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
8.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THW vs. FBTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
0.57%31.10%5.35%-11.52%-1.21%12.03%26.40%32.98%-5.40%16.95%
FBTCX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C
-1.15%38.48%-2.00%9.86%-8.64%-3.72%31.17%24.82%-4.55%24.81%

Correlation

The correlation between THW and FBTCX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.53

The correlation between THW and FBTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THW vs. FBTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THW
THW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
THW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
THW Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
THW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
THW Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTCX
FBTCX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FBTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THW vs. FBTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C (FBTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THWFBTCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

2.04

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

2.81

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

4.97

-2.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.92

14.52

-4.61

THW vs. FBTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THW Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FBTCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THW and FBTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THWFBTCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

2.04

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.30

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.37

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.26

+0.01

Drawdowns

THW vs. FBTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THW drawdown since its inception was -37.36%, smaller than the maximum FBTCX drawdown of -64.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THW and FBTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THWFBTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.36%

-64.04%

+26.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-9.04%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.48%

-37.26%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.53%

-37.26%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.36%

-39.37%

+2.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.88%

-9.04%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-23.08%

+13.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.09%

+0.11%

Volatility

THW vs. FBTCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) is 5.05%, while Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C (FBTCX) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that THW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THWFBTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

7.10%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

16.73%

-3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

22.12%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

23.63%

-4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

24.49%

-3.29%

THW vs. FBTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THW has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTCX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

THW vs. FBTCX - Dividend Comparison

THW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%, more than FBTCX's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBTCX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C
1.70%1.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.50%9.78%7.92%2.92%0.00%0.00%5.73%
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
11.41%10.96%12.72%12.00%9.56%8.60%8.85%10.11%12.08%10.29%10.91%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


THW and FBTCX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTCX has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to THW (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THW dropped -37.36% vs FBTCX's -64.04%.

FBTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THW and FBTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer