PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THRO vs. TACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

THRO vs. TACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

THRO vs. TACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
THRO
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF
-6.03%15.04%32.03%24.40%-11.67%
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund
1.74%10.93%11.76%7.43%-5.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THRO achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than TACK's 1.74% return.


THRO

1D
3.19%
1M
-5.19%
YTD
-6.03%
6M
-4.26%
1Y
14.50%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
10Y*

TACK

1D
1.80%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.90%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


THRO vs. TACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

THRO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TACK's 0.76% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

THRO vs. TACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THRO
THRO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
THRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
THRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
THRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
THRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

TACK
TACK Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THRO vs. TACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THROTACKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

1.01

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.50

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.49

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.51

7.15

-1.63

THRO vs. TACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the TACK Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THRO and TACK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THROTACKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.01

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.57

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between THRO and TACK is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

THRO vs. TACK - Dividend Comparison

THRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than TACK's 1.25% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
THRO
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF
0.19%0.15%0.73%0.55%0.90%
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund
1.25%1.18%1.26%1.29%0.89%

Drawdowns

THRO vs. TACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THRO drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, which is greater than TACK's maximum drawdown of -14.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRO and TACK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


THROTACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.54%

-14.49%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-9.74%

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.03%

-4.15%

-3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-4.31%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.02%

+0.72%

Volatility

THRO vs. TACK - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) at 4.13%. This indicates that THRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


THROTACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

4.13%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

7.47%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.25%

13.25%

+5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

11.33%

+7.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

11.33%

+7.56%