THRO vs. DOUG
THRO (iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF) is Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by iShares, while DOUG (Douglas Elliman Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, THRO returned 22.13%/yr vs -5.93%/yr for DOUG. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
THRO vs. DOUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THRO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than DOUG's -26.58% return.
THRO
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 22.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.99%
DOUG
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- -11.22%
- 6M
- -35.79%
- YTD
- -26.58%
- 1Y
- -17.92%
- 3Y*
- -5.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -29.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $398.28K | $594.12K | $777.61K | |
| $20.83M | $25.08M | $80.87M |
THRO vs. DOUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | 12.26% | 15.04% | 32.03% | 24.40% | -17.85% | -0.85% |
DOUG Douglas Elliman Inc. | -26.58% | 41.92% | -43.39% | -20.91% | -63.17% | 15.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between THRO and DOUG is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2021 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THRO vs. DOUG — Risk / Return Rank
THRO
DOUG
THRO vs. DOUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THRO | DOUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.00 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | -0.36 | +2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | -0.61 | +8.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THRO vs. DOUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THRO drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, smaller than the maximum DOUG drawdown of -90.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRO and DOUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THRO | DOUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.54% | -90.26% | +63.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -49.84% | +38.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -66.45% | +47.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -83.71% | +82.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -73.16% | +66.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 29.65% | -26.99% |
Volatility
THRO vs. DOUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) is 4.62%, while Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) has a volatility of 11.74%. This indicates that THRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THRO | DOUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 11.74% | -7.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 49.94% | -38.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 63.27% | -48.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 71.22% | -52.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 71.22% | -52.52% |
Dividends
THRO vs. DOUG - Dividend Comparison
THRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while DOUG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOUG Douglas Elliman Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.31% | 4.91% |
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | 0.25% | 0.15% | 0.73% | 0.55% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THRO and DOUG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DOUG has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to THRO (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THRO dropped -26.54% vs DOUG's -90.26%.
THRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THRO and DOUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer