PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THRO vs. DOUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

THRO vs. DOUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

THRO vs. DOUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
THRO
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF
-4.91%15.04%32.03%24.40%-17.85%-0.23%
DOUG
Douglas Elliman Inc.
-30.80%41.92%-43.39%-20.91%-63.17%-5.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THRO achieves a -4.91% return, which is significantly higher than DOUG's -30.80% return.


THRO

1D
1.19%
1M
-4.02%
YTD
-4.91%
6M
-3.10%
1Y
14.99%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
10Y*

DOUG

1D
0.61%
1M
-28.70%
YTD
-30.80%
6M
-42.86%
1Y
-4.09%
3Y*
-17.28%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THRO vs. DOUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THRO
THRO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
THRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
THRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
THRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
THRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DOUG
DOUG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DOUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DOUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THRO vs. DOUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THRODOUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

-0.06

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

0.48

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.07

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

-0.07

+1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.71

-0.19

+5.90

THRO vs. DOUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the DOUG Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THRO and DOUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THRODOUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

-0.06

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

-0.50

+1.04

Correlation

The correlation between THRO and DOUG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

THRO vs. DOUG - Dividend Comparison

THRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, while DOUG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
THRO
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF
0.19%0.15%0.73%0.55%0.90%
DOUG
Douglas Elliman Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%3.31%4.91%

Drawdowns

THRO vs. DOUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THRO drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, smaller than the maximum DOUG drawdown of -90.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRO and DOUG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


THRODOUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.54%

-90.26%

+63.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-48.55%

+37.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.94%

-84.65%

+77.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-72.43%

+65.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

18.88%

-16.10%

Volatility

THRO vs. DOUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) is 5.79%, while Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) has a volatility of 33.38%. This indicates that THRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


THRODOUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

33.38%

-27.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

49.00%

-38.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

77.04%

-58.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

71.57%

-52.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

71.57%

-52.68%