PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THPGX vs. BUFBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THPGX vs. BUFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THPGX achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than BUFBX's 12.34% return. Over the past 10 years, THPGX has outperformed BUFBX with an annualized return of 14.78%, while BUFBX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.95% annualized return.


THPGX

1D
-0.94%
1M
2.54%
YTD
10.97%
6M
13.30%
1Y
38.66%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
14.78%

BUFBX

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.54%
YTD
12.34%
6M
12.43%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THPGX vs. BUFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THPGX
Thompson LargeCap Fund
10.97%27.10%17.14%22.06%-15.78%28.09%15.49%33.59%-12.31%18.24%
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
12.34%10.37%10.26%7.42%3.97%29.97%-2.27%18.76%-7.01%13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between THPGX and BUFBX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 1994

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between THPGX and BUFBX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THPGX vs. BUFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THPGX
THPGX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
THPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
THPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
THPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
THPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFBX
BUFBX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BUFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THPGX vs. BUFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THPGXBUFBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.38

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

6.87

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.54

16.80

+2.74

THPGX vs. BUFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THPGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the BUFBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THPGX and BUFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THPGXBUFBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14

2.18

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.82

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.64

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.59

-0.09

Drawdowns

THPGX vs. BUFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THPGX drawdown since its inception was -65.52%, which is greater than BUFBX's maximum drawdown of -39.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THPGX and BUFBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THPGXBUFBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.52%

-39.78%

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-2.83%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-12.85%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.49%

-14.67%

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.68%

-35.51%

-5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.65%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-4.72%

-4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.16%

+0.84%

Volatility

THPGX vs. BUFBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX) is 2.72%, while Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that THPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THPGXBUFBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

3.10%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

6.61%

+2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

8.93%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.76%

13.40%

+4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

15.60%

+4.33%

THPGX vs. BUFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THPGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFBX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

THPGX vs. BUFBX - Dividend Comparison

THPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than BUFBX's 8.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
8.02%9.10%3.77%3.48%4.16%5.57%3.33%2.73%6.01%5.49%2.39%3.67%
THPGX
Thompson LargeCap Fund
5.05%5.60%11.97%8.38%5.06%4.95%0.90%2.73%0.89%0.82%0.80%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


THPGX and BUFBX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFBX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to THPGX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THPGX dropped -65.52% vs BUFBX's -39.78%.

THPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THPGX and BUFBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer