THPBX vs. DNLDX
THPBX (BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund) and DNLDX (BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund) are both mutual funds - THPBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BNY Mellon, while DNLDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by BNY Mellon. Over the past 10 years, THPBX returned 8.42%/yr vs 10.25%/yr for DNLDX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. THPBX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for DNLDX.
Performance
THPBX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THPBX achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than DNLDX's 12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, THPBX has underperformed DNLDX with an annualized return of 8.42%, while DNLDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.
THPBX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 16.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
DNLDX
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 12.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 23.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
THPBX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THPBX BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund | 5.48% | 12.98% | 11.38% | 16.62% | -15.68% | 12.68% | 9.62% | 20.34% | -3.90% | 11.78% |
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 12.91% | 9.79% | 22.27% | 16.99% | -14.34% | 26.49% | 9.29% | 16.82% | -14.46% | 16.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between THPBX and DNLDX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990 | 0.86 |
The correlation between THPBX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THPBX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank
THPBX
DNLDX
THPBX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund (THPBX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THPBX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 3.21 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.35 | 12.00 | -1.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THPBX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THPBX drawdown since its inception was -42.24%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THPBX and DNLDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THPBX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.24% | -63.69% | +21.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.50% | -7.29% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.69% | -20.42% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | -23.42% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.45% | -42.23% | +15.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.59% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -9.62% | +4.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 1.95% | -0.38% |
Volatility
THPBX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund (THPBX) is 3.64%, while BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that THPBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THPBX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 4.53% | -0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 10.13% | -2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.06% | 13.50% | -4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 18.55% | -6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.33% | 19.54% | -7.21% |
THPBX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
THPBX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
THPBX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison
THPBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, less than DNLDX's 13.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 13.31% | 14.15% | 15.24% | 1.69% | 8.82% | 17.74% | 2.77% | 2.65% | 11.14% | 11.32% | 1.00% | 3.12% |
THPBX BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund | 7.86% | 8.30% | 5.42% | 4.78% | 6.32% | 10.48% | 3.26% | 3.57% | 9.72% | 5.19% | 1.32% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THPBX and DNLDX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DNLDX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to THPBX (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THPBX dropped -42.24% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.
THPBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THPBX and DNLDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer