THMZ vs. VXUS
THMZ (Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. THMZ is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. Over the past year, THMZ returned 15.10% vs 32.01% for VXUS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. THMZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
THMZ vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THMZ achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.25% return.
THMZ
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- 15.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
THMZ vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF | 3.26% | 31.76% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.25% | 39.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between THMZ and VXUS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025 | 0.83 |
The correlation between THMZ and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THMZ vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
THMZ
VXUS
THMZ vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THMZ | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.85 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 11.14 | -7.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THMZ | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 2.12 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 0.39 | +1.26 |
Drawdowns
THMZ vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THMZ drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THMZ and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THMZ | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -35.97% | +19.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.99% | -11.27% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.99% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -8.22% | +5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 2.88% | +1.55% |
Volatility
THMZ vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) is 4.23%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that THMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THMZ | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 5.60% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 13.00% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 15.21% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 16.05% | +2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 17.16% | +1.56% |
THMZ vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
THMZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
THMZ vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
THMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than VXUS's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF | 0.41% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THMZ and VXUS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to THMZ (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THMZ dropped -15.99% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 1-year performance, VXUS leads with 32.01% vs 15.10% for THMZ. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, THMZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 32.01% return vs 15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for THMZ.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.41% for THMZ.
They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for THMZ and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THMZ and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer