PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THMZ vs. VOLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THMZ vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THMZ achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 40.29% return.


THMZ

1D
-2.36%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
0.98%
6M
0.66%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOLT

1D
-3.50%
1M
2.50%
YTD
40.29%
6M
38.12%
1Y
64.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THMZ vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
THMZ
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF
0.98%31.18%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
40.29%47.63%

Correlation

The correlation between THMZ and VOLT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

0.62

The correlation between THMZ and VOLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THMZ vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THMZ
THMZ Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
THMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
THMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
THMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
THMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VOLT
VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THMZ vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THMZVOLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.49

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

6.78

-5.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

18.99

-16.17

THMZ vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THMZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the VOLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THMZ and VOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THMZ vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THMZ drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THMZ and VOLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THMZVOLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-23.40%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-9.59%

-6.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-3.50%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-5.14%

+2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

3.42%

+1.05%

Volatility

THMZ vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) is 6.64%, while Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that THMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THMZVOLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

9.40%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.74%

18.29%

-4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

21.75%

-5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

24.55%

-5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

24.55%

-5.39%

THMZ vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

THMZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

THMZ vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

THMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than VOLT's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
THMZ
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF
0.24%0.30%0.00%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
0.32%0.46%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


THMZ and VOLT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOLT has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to THMZ (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THMZ dropped -15.99% vs VOLT's -23.40%.

On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 64.69% vs 12.58% for THMZ. On fees, THMZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, THMZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 64.69% return vs 12.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THMZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

VOLT has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.24% for THMZ.

They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for THMZ and 0.75% for VOLT.

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THMZ and VOLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer